Teams

OC NBTC - Gianna

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over WEEKDAY WOMEN · OC 4.0W

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-03-04vs OC LLW YLCC - IreneLost 01
L#1 DoublesMiriam Morales / Rikki Scharnell vs Marianne Provenzano / Susan Barrett2-6, 1-6
2022-02-25vs OC Lifetime SC - KellyWon 10
W#1 DoublesRikki Scharnell / Laura O'Leary vs Michelle Duenas / Michelle Frohlich0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-02-11vs OC FVTC - Susie RuizLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Czech / Rikki Scharnell vs Stacy Tzur / Julie Hull5-7, 1-6
2022-02-04vs OC Great Park - Nan Diesen-NgLost 01
L#1 DoublesMiriam Morales / Rikki Scharnell vs Su Prijyanonda / Paula Nishibayashi5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2022-01-28vs OC Huntington Club - JoLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Czech / Rikki Scharnell vs Angie Karahalios / Ida Shu3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 4.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Miriam Morales
published
3.77
Rikki Scharnell
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Gina Cereda
published 4
3.65
Jennifer Czech
published
3.55
Jeannine Sandling
published
3.34
3.30
Laura O'Leary
published
Gianna Marchal
published 3.5
3.19
Heather Nalle
published 3.5
3.15
Carrie Morton
published 4
Jill Chomer
published
Jodie McCollum
published
Kristy Gladding
published
Martha Deters
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Miriam Morales
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Rikki Scharnell
101W–99L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Gina Cereda
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Czech
16W–11L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Jeannine Sandling
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Helena Linton-Eriksson
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
Laura O'Leary
14W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Gianna Marchal
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Heather Nalle
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.19
4
Carrie Morton
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.15
Jill Chomer
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jodie McCollum
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristy Gladding
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Martha Deters
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.