Teams

OC LNRC - Nina

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over WEEKDAY WOMEN · OC 4.0W

16 players · average NTRP 3.94 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-03-18vs OC FVTC - Susie RuizWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan / Stacy Ison vs Yumiko Tokiwa / Miho Mori3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-03-11Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAnne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan / Renee Carlson vs Diana Bond / Joleen Wells4-6, 3-6
2022-02-25vs OC Lifetime RSC - BevWon 20
W#1 DoublesRegina Jacobs / Felice McGrath vs Annette Drake / Christine Reenders6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan / Courtney Zani vs Staci Howren / Janice Trojan7-5, 6-4
2022-02-18vs OC Great Park - Nan Diesen-NgLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristen Peay / Regina Jacobs vs Paula Nishibayashi / Su Prijyanonda1-6, 5-7
2022-01-21vs OC NBTC - GiannaWon 10
W#1 DoublesRegina Jacobs / Jaala Zabrocki vs Miriam Morales / Jeannine Sandling6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 4.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Felice McGrath
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Anne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.86
Jaala Zabrocki
published 4
3.84
Luna Qingyue Cai
published
3.79
Amy Berk
published 4
Gina Christian
published 4
3.69
Courtney Zani
published 4
3.62
Regina Jacobs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Stacy Ison
published
3.51
Libby Perry
published
3.41
Alma Bautista
published 4
3.35
Johanna Andren
published
Afsaneh Taghavi
published 3.5
Barb Brown
published
Nina Etedali
published
Pamela Shuken
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Regina Jacobs + Anne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan111051% games−11.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Felice McGrath
37W–14L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Anne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan
149W–69L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Jaala Zabrocki
12W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
Luna Qingyue Cai
10W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Amy Berk
6W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Gina Christian
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Courtney Zani
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Regina Jacobs
71W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Stacy Ison
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
Libby Perry
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.51
4
Alma Bautista
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
75%25%<1%
3.41
Johanna Andren
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Afsaneh Taghavi
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Barb Brown
27W–50L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nina Etedali
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pamela Shuken
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.