Teams

STSC- Stahl

2021 ADULT 40 & Over-OWL · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-16vs ACB-FrischkornSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKimberley Boman / Jill Ainsworth vs Lisa Bowlin / Michelle Cole7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesTiffany Bulgin vs Melinda Lilley6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMaggie Hudson / Dawn Vlahandreas vs Jamie Hoesly / Leslie Hofferd5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesStephenie Tucker / Jodi Berg vs Ann Frischkorn / Michelle McAuliffe4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2021-05-16vs ESTC- FollettLost 13
L#1 DoublesJill Ainsworth / Kimberley Boman vs Jen West / Megan Helfrich3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesStephenie Tucker vs Paula Cates2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Stahl / Maggie Hudson vs Terry Scherer / Kathy Thompson6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKaren Smith / Annette Hatley vs Paula Thompson / Amanda Jordan1-6, 4-6
2021-05-15vs ACB-FrischkornWon 31
W#1 DoublesMaggie Hudson / Tiffany Bulgin vs Jamie Hoesly / Leslie Hofferd6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKathy Stahl vs Michelle Cole7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Cook / Karen Smith vs Cristin Ricker / Kathryn Sanders1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJodi Berg / Annette Hatley vs Lisa Bowlin / Melinda Lilley2-6, 4-6
2021-05-15vs ESTC-NashLost 13
L#1 DoublesSusan Cook / Karen Smith vs Aubree Nash / Bobbi Kearney4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesStephenie Tucker vs Celeste Sather6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathy Stahl / Dawn Vlahandreas vs Jenny Kreutzer / Lee Ann Thompson1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnnette Hatley / Jodi Berg vs Krissi Martes / Sandi Martes1-6, 0-6
2021-05-14vs ESTC-NashWon 31
W#1 DoublesKimberley Boman / Jill Ainsworth vs Celeste Sather / Jae Lee6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesMarianne Bradshaw vs Anita Geisler6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTiffany Bulgin / Kathy Stahl vs Evangeline Laurie / Radona Peterson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJodi Berg / Susan Cook vs Renee LaFrance / Lindsey Poulsen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-14vs ESTC- FollettLost 13
W#1 DoublesStephenie Tucker / Kimberley Boman vs Sarah Follett / Paula Thompson6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesTiffany Bulgin vs Paula Cates3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDawn Vlahandreas / Karen Smith vs Angela Hamilton / Megan Helfrich4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnnette Hatley / Marianne Bradshaw vs Jen West - * / Lisa Tucker6-3, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Karen Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.56
Tiffany Bulgin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.44
Marianne Bradshaw
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.39
Maggie Hudson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Stephenie Tucker
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Jill Ainsworth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Kimberley Boman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Dawn Vlahandreas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Kathy Stahl
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.90
Annette Hatley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Susan Cook
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jodi Berg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maggie Hudson + Tiffany Bulgin15660% games+8.0% vs expected
Maggie Hudson + Kimberley Boman7158% games+8.0% vs expected
Jill Ainsworth + Kimberley Boman22955% games−0.2% vs expected
Stephenie Tucker + Kimberley Boman101051% games−0.4% vs expected
Maggie Hudson + Stephenie Tucker11850% games−3.9% vs expected
Kathy Stahl + Stephenie Tucker2342% games−7.7% vs expected
Maggie Hudson + Kathy Stahl6452% games−12.3% vs expected
Karen Smith + Kimberley Boman5074% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Karen Smith
44W–30L career · 4 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.63
4
Tiffany Bulgin
52W–38L career · 4 lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
3.56
Marianne Bradshaw
19W–21L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%67%32%
3.44
3.5
Maggie Hudson
78W–51L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Stephenie Tucker
94W–81L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
Jill Ainsworth
51W–21L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Kimberley Boman
71W–47L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Dawn Vlahandreas
10W–22L career · 3 lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
3.02
3.5
Kathy Stahl
69W–81L career · 4 lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Annette Hatley
88W–67L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Susan Cook
22W–13L career · type S · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jodi Berg
26W–36L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.