Teams

LT

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-05-19vs HMTC MAROONWon 10
W#2 DoublesDan Bikos / Kim Bender vs Stu Hoime / Shane Westlind6-4, 6-2
2021-05-12vs MLFSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJesse Fleming / David van Thuyne vs Peter Marinescu / Reeves Anderson7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDerrick van der Sluys / Dan Bikos vs Dean Cunningham / Gordon Beck1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-05-05vs LVTA NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid van Thuyne / Jim Kelly vs Jared Petersen / Brian Smith2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDan Bikos / Brad Biggerstaff vs Zachary Schaefer / Daniel Byers1-6, 3-6
2021-04-29vs MLFLost 01
L#2 SinglesDavid van Thuyne vs Ian Hay-Arthur4-6, 1-6
2021-04-28vs HMTC MAROONWon 10
W#3 DoublesFederico Pardina / Dan Bikos vs Neal McConnellogue / Dennis Knopf6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
David van Thuyne
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.73
3.65
Jim Kelly
published
3.57
Mark Sundstedt
published
3.56
Federico Pardina
published 4
3.33
Dan Bikos
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
David Baird
published 3.5
Brad Biggerstaff
published 3.5
Noah Sorensen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jim Kelly + Mark Sundstedt91147% games+1.0% vs expected
Jim Kelly + Derrick van der Sluys4545% games−3.5% vs expected
Derrick van der Sluys + David van Thuyne5154% gamesnot enough data
Jim Kelly + David van Thuyne224 matchesnot enough data
David Baird + Brad Biggerstaff134 matchesnot enough data
Brad Biggerstaff + Dan Bikos134 matchesnot enough data
Dan Bikos + Mark Sundstedt044 matchesnot enough data
Derrick van der Sluys + Dan Bikos213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David van Thuyne
70W–36L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Derrick van der Sluys
28W–17L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Jim Kelly
37W–52L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.65
Mark Sundstedt
25W–40L career · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Federico Pardina
23W–22L career · no lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Dan Bikos
34W–70L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
David Baird
5W–22L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Brad Biggerstaff
5W–14L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Noah Sorensen
6W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.