Teams

LVTA NAVY

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.80 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-26vs LTWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrian Petersen / Dennis Flanigan vs Mark Sundstedt / Noah Sorensen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-05-19vs MLFLost 02
L#2 DoublesJeff Davis / Nicholas Roe vs Seokjin Lee / Aaron Phillips5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAdam Less / Brian Petersen vs Gordon Beck / Jeff Brauch1-6, 0-6
2021-05-12vs HMTC MAROONWon 20
W#1 DoublesJared Petersen / Nicholas Roe vs David Trumbo / Christopher Trumbo2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeff Davis / Dennis Flanigan vs Stu Hoime / Jeff Nyland6-2, 6-4
2021-05-05vs LTWon 20
W#2 DoublesJeff Davis / Nicholas Roe vs Derrick van der Sluys / Mark Sundstedt6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAdam Less vs Kim Bender6-1, 6-3
2021-05-04vs HMTC MAROONWon 10
W#2 DoublesDennis Flanigan / Adam Less vs Neal McConnellogue / Richard Scheig6-4, 6-2
2021-04-28vs MLFLost 02
L#1 DoublesNicholas Roe / Adam Less vs Jeff Keepman / Reeves Anderson2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDennis Flanigan / Kenneth Keller vs Seokjin Lee / Jaden Ray2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Jared Petersen
published
3.82
Adam Less
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Nicholas Roe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.53
Dennis Flanigan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.53
Kenneth Keller
published
Brian Petersen
published 3.5
Daniel Ault
published 3.5
Zachary Schaefer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jared Petersen + Adam Less4254% games−0.4% vs expected
Dennis Flanigan + Kenneth Keller1446% games−4.3% vs expected
Jared Petersen + Dennis Flanigan2345% games−5.6% vs expected
Brian Petersen + Dennis Flanigan0534% games−19.5% vs expected
Dennis Flanigan + Adam Less6257% gamesnot enough data
Dennis Flanigan + Daniel Ault134 matchesnot enough data
Nicholas Roe + Adam Less213 matchesnot enough data
Kenneth Keller + Adam Less213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jared Petersen
68W–59L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Adam Less
76W–49L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Nicholas Roe
54W–42L career · 4 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Dennis Flanigan
52W–52L career · 4 lines in 2021
40%60%<1%
3.53
Kenneth Keller
9W–31L career · no lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Brian Petersen
4W–17L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Daniel Ault
6W–15L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Zachary Schaefer
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.