Teams

HMTC MAROON

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.80 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-26vs MLFLost 02
L#1 DoublesStu Hoime / Shane Westlind vs Jeremy Johnson / Jeff Keepman1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMaximiliano Ortiz Alvarado / Dennis Knopf vs David Trevino / Dean Cunningham2-6, 4-6
2021-05-19vs LTLost 01
L#2 DoublesStu Hoime / Shane Westlind vs Dan Bikos / Kim Bender4-6, 2-6
2021-05-12vs LVTA NAVYSplit 11
L#2 DoublesStu Hoime / Jeff Nyland vs Jeff Davis / Dennis Flanigan2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMaximiliano Ortiz Alvarado / Neal McConnellogue vs Zachary Schaefer / Brian Petersen6-4, 6-4
2021-05-05vs MLFWon 10
W#3 DoublesStu Hoime / Jeff Nyland vs Jeremy Johnson / Joe Ashbee2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-04vs LVTA NAVYLost 01
L#2 DoublesNeal McConnellogue / Richard Scheig vs Dennis Flanigan / Adam Less4-6, 2-6
2021-04-28vs LTLost 01
L#3 DoublesNeal McConnellogue / Dennis Knopf vs Federico Pardina / Dan Bikos1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Stephen Rivoire
published 4
3.57
Stu Hoime
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.40
Kendal Sanders
published
3.32
Neal McConnellogue
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Dennis Knopf
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
David Trumbo
published
Jeff Nyland
published
Shane Westlind
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kendal Sanders + Stu Hoime033 matchesnot enough data
Stu Hoime + Neal McConnellogue033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stephen Rivoire
39W–18L career · no lines in 2021
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Christopher Trumbo
8W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Stu Hoime
42W–66L career · 4 lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.57
Kendal Sanders
57W–84L career · no lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Neal McConnellogue
62W–55L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Dennis Knopf
16W–67L career · 2 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.10
David Trumbo
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jeff Nyland
7W–10L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Shane Westlind
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.