Teams

Ky/Lex/Fain-Marnitz

2025 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Women 2.5 2nd Session

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
W#1 DoublesHannah Golibersuch / Dana Hume vs Niki Moss / Elizabeth Yanik7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAllison Moreman vs Meghan Whitlow6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesBrittni Fain-Marnitz / Raquel Wilson vs Anna Marino / Elizabeth Yanik6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKristin Harrison / Hannah Golibersuch vs Meghan Whitlow / Amanda Fredericks6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesBrittni Fain-Marnitz / Allison Moreman vs Anna Masciantonio / Allyson Foster6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKatie Landon / Charlotte Nickerson vs Meghan Whitlow / Niki Moss6-0, 6-2
W#1 DoublesDana Hume / Kristin Harrison vs Anna Marino / Niki Moss7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRaquel Wilson vs Elizabeth Yanik6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAllison Moreman / Charlotte Nickerson vs Anna Masciantonio / Meghan Whitlow6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesDana Hume / Hannah Golibersuch vs Allyson Foster / Amanda Fredericks6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesRaquel Wilson vs Anna Masciantonio6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKatie Landon / Charlotte Nickerson vs Elizabeth Yanik / Meghan Whitlow6-0, 6-1
W#1 DoublesBrittni Fain-Marnitz / Raquel Wilson vs Anna Marino / Elizabeth Yanik6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesCharlotte Nickerson vs Niki Moss5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKatie Landon / Kristin Harrison vs Allyson Foster / Meghan Whitlow6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesBrittni Fain-Marnitz / Charlotte Nickerson vs Allyson Foster / Amanda Fredericks6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesRaquel Wilson vs Kristin Harrison6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesHannah Golibersuch / Niki Moss vs Elizabeth Yanik / Noriko Hosoda3-6, 0-6
2025-02-16vs Ky/Lex/Lykins(non-playing captain)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCharlotte Nickerson / Niki Moss vs Amanda Fredericks / Elizabeth Yanik6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesKatie Landon / Niki Moss vs Anna Masciantonio / Amanda Fredericks6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAllison Moreman vs Raquel Wilson3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCharlotte Nickerson / Anna Marino vs Elizabeth Yanik / Allyson Foster7-5, 6-4
W#1 DoublesCharlotte Nickerson / Kristin Harrison vs Noriko Hosoda / Anna Masciantonio6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRaquel Wilson vs Katie Landon6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrittni Fain-Marnitz / Hannah Golibersuch vs Allyson Foster / Amanda Fredericks6-1, 6-4
2025-01-19vs KY/LEX/2.5 W OpenWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristin Harrison / Allison Moreman vs Jennifer Hoy / Elizabeth Yanik6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBrittni Fain-Marnitz / Katie Landon vs Raquel Wilson / Noriko Hosoda6-0, 6-4
2025-01-11vs Ky/Lex/Lykins(non-playing captain)Split 11
W#1 DoublesBrittni Fain-Marnitz / Katie Landon vs Allyson Foster / Jennifer Hoy6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAnna Masciantonio / Raquel Wilson vs Allison Moreman / Kristin Harrison0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 2nd Session have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Dana Hume
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Andrea Covington
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Katie Landon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.67
Raquel Wilson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
2.66
Allison Moreman
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.52
Brittni Fain-Marnitz
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.50
Hannah Golibersuch
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.24
Charlotte Nickerson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brittni Fain-Marnitz + Katie Landon303 matchesnot enough data
Allison Moreman + Katie Landon123 matchesnot enough data
Charlotte Nickerson + Katie Landon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dana Hume
22W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Andrea Covington
8W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie Landon
18W–17L career · 8 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Raquel Wilson
23W–24L career · 10 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Allison Moreman
21W–23L career · 7 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Brittni Fain-Marnitz
16W–14L career · 9 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.52
Hannah Golibersuch
11W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
3
Charlotte Nickerson
12W–21L career · 8 lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.