Teams

Ky/Lex/Lykins(non-playing captain)

2025 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Women 2.5 2nd Session

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2025-05-23vs Ky/Lex/Fain-MarnitzLost 02
L#1 DoublesNiki Moss / Elizabeth Yanik vs Hannah Golibersuch / Dana Hume5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMeghan Whitlow vs Allison Moreman0-6, 0-6
2025-05-15vs Ky/Lex/Fain-MarnitzLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnna Marino / Elizabeth Yanik vs Brittni Fain-Marnitz / Raquel Wilson1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMeghan Whitlow / Amanda Fredericks vs Kristin Harrison / Hannah Golibersuch0-6, 0-6
2025-05-04vs Ky/Lex/Fain-MarnitzLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnna Masciantonio / Allyson Foster vs Brittni Fain-Marnitz / Allison Moreman0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMeghan Whitlow / Niki Moss vs Katie Landon / Charlotte Nickerson0-6, 2-6
2025-04-19vs Ky/Lex/Fain-MarnitzLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnna Marino / Niki Moss vs Dana Hume / Kristin Harrison5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Yanik vs Raquel Wilson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnna Masciantonio / Meghan Whitlow vs Allison Moreman / Charlotte Nickerson0-6, 0-6
2025-03-31vs Ky/Lex/Fain-MarnitzLost 03
L#1 DoublesAllyson Foster / Amanda Fredericks vs Dana Hume / Hannah Golibersuch2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAnna Masciantonio vs Raquel Wilson2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Yanik / Meghan Whitlow vs Katie Landon / Charlotte Nickerson0-6, 1-6
2025-03-15vs Ky/Lex/Fain-MarnitzLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnna Marino / Elizabeth Yanik vs Brittni Fain-Marnitz / Raquel Wilson0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesNiki Moss vs Charlotte Nickerson7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAllyson Foster / Meghan Whitlow vs Katie Landon / Kristin Harrison0-6, 0-6
2025-02-25vs Ky/Lex/Fain-MarnitzLost 02
L#1 DoublesAllyson Foster / Amanda Fredericks vs Brittni Fain-Marnitz / Charlotte Nickerson4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHannah Golibersuch / Niki Moss vs Elizabeth Yanik / Noriko Hosoda3-6, 0-6
2025-02-16vs KY/LEX/2.5 W OpenWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmanda Fredericks / Elizabeth Yanik vs Charlotte Nickerson / Niki Moss2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAnna Marino vs Jennifer Hoy6-1, 6-2
2025-02-06Won 20
W#1 DoublesKatie Landon / Niki Moss vs Anna Masciantonio / Amanda Fredericks6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCharlotte Nickerson / Anna Marino vs Elizabeth Yanik / Allyson Foster7-5, 6-4
2025-01-23vs Ky/Lex/Fain-MarnitzLost 02
L#1 DoublesNoriko Hosoda / Anna Masciantonio vs Charlotte Nickerson / Kristin Harrison0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAllyson Foster / Amanda Fredericks vs Brittni Fain-Marnitz / Hannah Golibersuch1-6, 4-6
2025-01-19vs Ky/Lex/Fain-MarnitzLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Hoy / Elizabeth Yanik vs Kristin Harrison / Allison Moreman0-6, 4-6
2025-01-11vs Ky/Lex/Fain-MarnitzLost 02
L#1 DoublesAllyson Foster / Jennifer Hoy vs Brittni Fain-Marnitz / Katie Landon0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAnna Masciantonio / Raquel Wilson vs Allison Moreman / Kristin Harrison0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 2.5 2nd Session
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ky/Lex/Fain-Marnitz60180141
2Ky/Lex/Lykins(non-playing captain)0601836218

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Leah Lykins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.42
Amanda Fredericks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.33
Anna Marino
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
2.30
Elizabeth Yanik
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.26
Niki Moss
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Anna Masciantonio
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.97
Allyson Foster
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
1.72
Meghan Whitlow
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allyson Foster + Amanda Fredericks2540% games+2.3% vs expected
Niki Moss + Anna Marino3253% gamesnot enough data
Amanda Fredericks + Meghan Whitlow123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leah Lykins
52W–67L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
2.5
Amanda Fredericks
18W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.42
2.5
Anna Marino
21W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.33
2.5
Elizabeth Yanik
10W–22L career · 9 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.30
Niki Moss
14W–31L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Anna Masciantonio
1W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Allyson Foster
10W–32L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Meghan Whitlow
3W–21L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.