Teams

KY/LEX/2.5 W Open

2025 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Women 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-02-25vs Ky/Lex/Fain-MarnitzWon 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Yanik / Noriko Hosoda vs Hannah Golibersuch / Niki Moss6-3, 6-0
2025-02-16vs Ky/Lex/Lykins(non-playing captain)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJennifer Hoy vs Anna Marino1-6, 2-6
2025-01-23vs Ky/Lex/Fain-MarnitzLost 01
L#1 DoublesNoriko Hosoda / Anna Masciantonio vs Charlotte Nickerson / Kristin Harrison0-6, 2-6
2025-01-19vs Ky/Lex/Fain-MarnitzLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Hoy / Elizabeth Yanik vs Kristin Harrison / Allison Moreman0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRaquel Wilson / Noriko Hosoda vs Brittni Fain-Marnitz / Katie Landon0-6, 4-6
2025-01-11vs Ky/Lex/Fain-MarnitzLost 01
L#1 DoublesAllyson Foster / Jennifer Hoy vs Brittni Fain-Marnitz / Katie Landon0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ky/Lex/Russ (non-playing captain)5111714116
2KY/LEX/2.5 W Open1551327175

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Leslie Russ
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.61
Raquel Wilson
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
2.42
Amanda Fredericks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.30
Elizabeth Yanik
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Anna Masciantonio
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.22
Noriko Hosoda
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
1.97
Allyson Foster
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
Jennifer Hoy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allyson Foster + Amanda Fredericks2540% games+2.3% vs expected
Jennifer Hoy + Allyson Foster033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leslie Russ
39W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.65
Raquel Wilson
23W–27L career · 11 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.61
2.5
Amanda Fredericks
18W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.42
2.5
Elizabeth Yanik
10W–22L career · 9 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.30
2.5
Anna Masciantonio
1W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Noriko Hosoda
9W–33L career · 8 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.22
2.5
Allyson Foster
10W–32L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Jennifer Hoy
1W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.