Teams

LOCH.Pelt

2023 CTRL Fall Singles 40 & Over · Fall Singles 40 & Over 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-12-11Won 20
W#1 SinglesMichelle Hoyles vs AnneSophie Dorey6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesKristine Pelt vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-11-24vs TOC.MartinLost 01
L#2 SinglesKristine Pelt vs Maura Lever4-6, 3-6
2023-11-15vs TOC.SmythLost 02
L#1 SinglesWendy Hanshew vs Donna Spero7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMichelle Hoyles vs Dana Cantrell6-7, 1-6
2023-11-07vs APEX.LongSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMichelle Hoyles vs Cari DeCandia6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesStephannie Messina vs Denise Decandia4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-10-18vs TOC.MartinWon 30
W#1 SinglesWendy Hanshew vs Barbara Gillespie6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMichelle Hoyles vs Rebecca Jacobsen6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesStephannie Messina vs Leah Lee6-3, 6-1
2023-10-04vs APEX.LongSplit 11
L#1 SinglesWendy Hanshew vs Cari DeCandia7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMichelle Hoyles vs Denise Decandia6-1, 7-5
2023-09-20vs TOC.IrishWon 10
W#2 SinglesKristine Pelt vs Lusia Li6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Wendy Hanshew
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Kristine Pelt
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Stephannie Messina
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Michelle Hoyles
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
2.94
Sharon Poindexter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Hoyles + Kristine Pelt6847% games−0.5% vs expected
Wendy Hanshew + Kristine Pelt4453% games−4.4% vs expected
Michelle Hoyles + Ana Maria Fernandez Serrat2444% games−5.2% vs expected
Wendy Hanshew + Michelle Hoyles1447% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Wendy Hanshew
111W–146L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Kristine Pelt
155W–108L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Stephannie Messina
122W–62L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Michelle Hoyles
127W–127L career · 5 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Ana Maria Fernandez Serrat
12W–26L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
Sharon Poindexter
1W–13L career · no lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.