Teams

TOC.Martin

2023 CTRL Fall Singles 40 & Over · Fall Singles 40 & Over 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-11-24vs LOCH.PeltSplit 11
L#1 SinglesRosanne Facktor vs Ana Maria Fernandez Serrat6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMaura Lever vs Kristine Pelt6-4, 6-3
2023-11-01vs TOC.SmythLost 02
L#1 SinglesRosanne Facktor vs Dana Cantrell3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMaura Lever vs Sarah Franks4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-10-25vs APEX.LongSplit 11
L#1 SinglesRebecca Jacobsen vs Kinsey Wennerstrom7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesEllen Libby vs Stephanie Hanses6-1, 6-0
2023-10-24vs TOC.IrishLost 01
L#2 SinglesMaura Lever vs Lusia Li3-6, 2-6
2023-10-18vs LOCH.PeltLost 01
L#2 SinglesRebecca Jacobsen vs Michelle Hoyles2-6, 4-6
2023-10-11vs TOC.IrishSplit 11
L#1 SinglesRosanne Facktor vs Emily Childs1-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesMaura Lever vs Lusia Li1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-09-20Won 10
W#3 SinglesRebecca Jacobsen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Jennifer Kuzma
published
3.46
Ellen Libby
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Dale Martin
published 3.5
3.18
Maura Lever
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Rebecca Jacobsen
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Rosanne Facktor
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.75
Betsy Fulcher
published 3
Leah Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Jacobsen + Maura Lever6650% games−2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Kuzma
51W–68L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
3.5
Ellen Libby
140W–97L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Dale Martin
20W–16L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Maura Lever
141W–128L career · 4 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Rebecca Jacobsen
168W–182L career · 3 lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Rosanne Facktor
34W–72L career · 3 lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.12
3
Betsy Fulcher
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
Leah Lee
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.