← Teams

TOC.Smyth

2023 CTRL Fall Singles 40 & Over · Fall Singles 40 & Over 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-12-07Won 1–0
W#3 SinglesDana Cantrell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-12-06vs LOCH.PeltWon 1–0
W#1 SinglesMary Jo Dunnington vs Ana Maria Fernandez Serrat6-0, 6-0
2023-11-15vs LOCH.PeltWon 1–0
W#2 SinglesDana Cantrell vs Michelle Hoyles7-6, 6-1
2023-11-01vs TOC.MartinWon 2–0
W#1 SinglesDana Cantrell vs Rosanne Facktor6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesRoberta Hadley vs Jennifer Kuzma6-2, 7-5
2023-10-18vs APEX.LongWon 2–0
W#2 SinglesMary Jo Dunnington vs Lisa Montague6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesRoberta Hadley vs Mary T Long6-1, 6-2
2023-10-04Won 1–0
W#2 SinglesRoberta Hadley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-27Won 1–0
W#3 SinglesRoberta Hadley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Mary Jo Dunnington
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.52
Dana Cantrell
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Sarah Franks
published —
3.39
Roberta Hadley
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Donna Spero
published —
3.27
Berna Tareen
published 3.5
2.92
Cheryl Smyth
published 3
2.91
Sheza Healey
published —
2.84
Suzanne Hallquist
published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheza Healey + Suzanne Hallquist1–23 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mary Jo Dunnington
255W–118L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
Dana Cantrell
57W–40L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.52
—
Sarah Franks
52W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%38%
3.46
3.5
Roberta Hadley
245W–120L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
—
Donna Spero
20W–12L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Berna Tareen
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Cheryl Smyth
211W–231L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
2.92
—
Sheza Healey
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.91
—
Suzanne Hallquist
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.