Teams

DTC

2024 NTA ADULT 65 & OVER LEAGUE · 7.0 MEN

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-29vs NV/SABILLO/ADULT65&OVER/M7.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesWilliam Feast / Bruce Hansen vs Stephen Newell / Meynardo Sanchez6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTimothy Havasi / Sandy Mann vs Charles Forbile / Edgar Rizarri2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMaurice Silva / Samuel Gordon vs Robert Campbell / Jabo Tang3-6, 2-6
2024-03-22vs SPANISH OAKS #2Lost 03
L#1 DoublesThomas Waite / Maurice Silva vs Rick Holden / Michael Miller2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCraig Slayter / Timothy Havasi vs Gary Miller / George Mulopulos1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesNigel White / Michael Garvin vs Absalom Alcaraz / Jack Braman1-6, 2-6
2024-03-08vs NV/SABILLO/ADULT65&OVER/M7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBruce Hansen / Charles Shomaker vs Charles Forbile / Edgar Rizarri0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSandy Mann / Michael Garvin vs Robert Campbell / Jabo Tang1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesThomas Waite / Samuel Gordon vs Stephen Newell / Jim Roulias6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2024-03-01vs SPANISH OAKS #2Won 21
L#1 DoublesWilliam Feast / Craig Slayter vs George Mulopulos / Rick Holden5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBruce Hansen / Michael Garvin vs Michael Fiscus / JOHN MacDONALD4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesThomas Waite / Charles Shomaker vs Jack Braman / Absalom Alcaraz6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-02-16vs NV/SABILLO/ADULT65&OVER/M7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesThomas Waite / Samuel Gordon vs Edgar Rizarri / Charles Forbile1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMaurice Silva / Sandy Mann vs Robert Campbell / Jabo Tang2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBruce Hansen / Craig Slayter vs Reynaldo Salditos / Stephen Newell2-6, 4-6
2024-02-09vs SPANISH OAKS #2Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBruce Hansen / Thomas Waite vs JOHN MacDONALD / KRISTON QUALLS3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSamuel Gordon / Timothy Havasi vs Rick Holden / George Mulopulos1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSandy Mann / Michael Garvin vs Absalom Alcaraz / Jack Braman7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2024-01-26vs NV/SABILLO/ADULT65&OVER/M7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCraig Slayter / Sandy Mann vs Stephen Newell / Jim Roulias3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWilliam Feast / Maurice Silva vs Robert Campbell / Jabo Tang2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesThomas Garcia / Timothy Havasi vs PEPITO RONQUILLO / Miguel Becerra6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-01-19vs SPANISH OAKS #2Lost 12
W#1 DoublesWilliam Feast / Thomas Garcia vs JOHN MacDONALD / KRISTON QUALLS7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSamuel Gordon / Maurice Silva vs Rick Holden / Michael Fiscus4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTimothy Havasi / Michael Garvin vs Gary Miller / George Mulopulos1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bruce Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.18
Nigel White
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Samuel Gordon
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.99
William Feast
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.86
Craig Slayter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Charles Shomaker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Sandy Mann
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.64
Maurice Silva
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.63
Thomas Waite
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Michael Garvin
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Timothy Havasi
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maurice Silva + Samuel Gordon51345% games+8.4% vs expected
Craig Slayter + Nigel White2844% games+1.2% vs expected
Sandy Mann + Nigel White91148% games+0.6% vs expected
Thomas Waite + Samuel Gordon11439% games−2.8% vs expected
Thomas Waite + Sandy Mann72337% games−4.2% vs expected
Maurice Silva + Sandy Mann21237% games−5.1% vs expected
Samuel Gordon + William Feast4545% games−5.8% vs expected
Thomas Waite + Nigel White2637% games−6.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bruce Hansen
3W–16L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Nigel White
41W–76L career · 1 line in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Samuel Gordon
26W–65L career · 5 lines in 2024
38%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
William Feast
58W–182L career · 4 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.99
3.5
Craig Slayter
103W–194L career · 4 lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
2.86
3
Charles Shomaker
3W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandy Mann
36W–140L career · 5 lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
2.72
3
Maurice Silva
50W–174L career · 5 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
2.64
Thomas Waite
41W–133L career · 5 lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
2.63
Michael Garvin
14W–51L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Timothy Havasi
20W–39L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.