Teams

WTC - Cook - 18 TriLevel 3.5,3.0,2.5

2025 Dothan USTA Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level Men 3.5, 3.0, 2.5

7 players · average NTRP 2.83 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesColby Shimabukuro / Kyle Johnson vs Jackson Dennis / Caleb Cruz6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJT Angeloff / Taylor Hara vs Davis Drake / Billy Ernst2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJustice Bull / Aaron Worthington vs Walton Ashwander / Stetson Nichols5-7, 6-7
W#1 DoublesKyle Johnson / Colby Shimabukuro vs Houston Holmes / Andrew Poston4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJordan Kennedy / Taylor Hara vs Devin Snuggs / Dennis Leger5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJustice Bull / Blake Wallace vs Robert Black / Derin Ercen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-14vs WTC - Muller 18 TriLevel 3.5,3.0,2.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesKyle Johnson / Taylor Hara vs Justin Littles / Joseph Cason4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBlake Wallace / Aaron Worthington vs Clayton Thornton / Robert Callander7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJT Angeloff / Jordan Kennedy vs Matt Langford / Davis Drake3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAaron Worthington / Justice Bull vs Walton Ashwander / Martin Everett4-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesColby Shimabukuro / Taylor Hara vs Houston Holmes / Dale Whittle6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJordan Kennedy / JT Angeloff vs Payne Henderson / Devin Snuggs6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJustice Bull / Aaron Worthington vs Robert Black / Derin Ercen7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level Men 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Colby Shimabukuro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Taylor Hara
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Johnny Cook
published
Aaron Worthington
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Blake Wallace
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
JT Angeloff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Justice Bull
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aaron Worthington + Justice Bull123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Colby Shimabukuro
14W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Taylor Hara
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Johnny Cook
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
2.5
Aaron Worthington
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Blake Wallace
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
JT Angeloff
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Justice Bull
1W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.