Teams

WTC - Muller 18 TriLevel 3.5,3.0,2.5

2025 Dothan USTA Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level Men 3.5, 3.0, 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-28vs WTC - Holmes 18 TriLevel 3.5,3.0,2.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesJoseph Cason / Justin Littles vs Dale Whittle / Andrew Poston4-6, 5-4
L#3 DoublesClayton Thornton / Robert Callander vs Derin Ercen / Robert Black1-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesPaul Muller II / Joseph Cason vs Jackson Dennis / Caleb Cruz3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEric Peel / Justin Littles vs Curt Harris / Bradley Wright6-3, 6-4
2025-07-14vs WTC - Cook - 18 TriLevel 3.5,3.0,2.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesJustin Littles / Joseph Cason vs Kyle Johnson / Taylor Hara6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesClayton Thornton / Robert Callander vs Blake Wallace / Aaron Worthington5-7, 4-6
W#1 DoublesPaul Muller II / Joseph Cason vs Andrew Poston / Houston Holmes6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKarl Adkison / Eric Peel vs Payne Henderson / Dennis Leger6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTrey Wingard / Robert Callander vs Adam Edwards / Derin Ercen1-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesPaul Muller II / Joseph Cason vs Caleb Cruz / Jackson Dennis6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaul Muller / Eric Peel vs Curt Harris / Bradley Wright4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobert Callander / Trey Wingard vs Stetson Nichols / Walton Ashwander0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level Men 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Joseph Cason
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Justin Littles
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Paul Muller II
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Eric Peel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Clayton Thornton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Karl Adkison
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Muller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Callander
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Trey Wingard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joseph Cason + Paul Muller II303 matchesnot enough data
Paul Muller II + Paul Muller033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joseph Cason
14W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Justin Littles
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Paul Muller II
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Eric Peel
15W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
2.5
Clayton Thornton
0W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karl Adkison
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Paul Muller
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Robert Callander
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Trey Wingard
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.