Teams

WTC - Jackson 18 TriLevel 3.5,3.0,2.5

2025 Dothan USTA Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level Men 3.5, 3.0, 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesJackson Dennis / Caleb Cruz vs Colby Shimabukuro / Kyle Johnson1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDavis Drake / Billy Ernst vs JT Angeloff / Taylor Hara6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesWalton Ashwander / Stetson Nichols vs Justice Bull / Aaron Worthington7-5, 7-6
L#1 DoublesJackson Dennis / Caleb Cruz vs Paul Muller II / Joseph Cason6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCurt Harris / Bradley Wright vs Eric Peel / Justin Littles3-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesJackson Dennis / Caleb Cruz vs Dale Whittle / Andrew Poston6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBilly Ernst / Davis Drake vs Payne Henderson / Dennis Leger4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesWalton Ashwander / Stetson Nichols vs Adam Edwards / Robert Black4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatt Langford / Davis Drake vs JT Angeloff / Jordan Kennedy6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWalton Ashwander / Martin Everett vs Aaron Worthington / Justice Bull6-4, 7-5
L#1 DoublesCaleb Cruz / Jackson Dennis vs Paul Muller II / Joseph Cason4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCurt Harris / Bradley Wright vs Paul Muller / Eric Peel6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesStetson Nichols / Walton Ashwander vs Robert Callander / Trey Wingard6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level Men 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Caleb Cruz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Jackson Dennis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Matt Langford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Billy Ernst
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Bradley Wright
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Davis Drake
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Martin Everett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Stetson Nichols
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Walton Ashwander
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caleb Cruz + Jackson Dennis2352% games−1.6% vs expected
Walton Ashwander + Stetson Nichols303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caleb Cruz
11W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.41
Jackson Dennis
10W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Matt Langford
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
3
Billy Ernst
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
3.5
Bradley Wright
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.94
3
Davis Drake
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Martin Everett
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Stetson Nichols
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Walton Ashwander
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.