Teams

Ace Athletics-Harmon

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W AM

13 players · average NTRP 3.31 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-05-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Hales / Bonnie Whitesides vs Malisa Bowen / Audrey Dufel5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesJaime Vance / Bonnie Whitesides vs Kim Cronin / Jessica Gardner6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2023-05-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Hales / Bonnie Whitesides vs Becky Hall / Sharon Larkin6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Jaime Vance
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #2 Singles 31% · published 4
3.33
Bonnie Whitesides
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Emily Hales
usually #1 Singles 31%, also #2 Singles 23% · published
3.19
Jennifer Tooley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Jessica Whittaker
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.16
Betty Peterson
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #2 Singles 23% · published 3.5
3.04
Diane Poole
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.91
Lori Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.85
Maria Pettit
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.84
Rebecca Harman
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
KayeLynn BASTIAN
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Elaine Day
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
Lindsey Williams
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Tooley + Jaime Vance8259% games+10.8% vs expected
Jessica Whittaker + Jaime Vance16069% games+9.5% vs expected
Jessica Whittaker + Bonnie Whitesides2548% games+9.5% vs expected
Jaime Vance + Bonnie Whitesides5059% games+9.3% vs expected
Rebecca Harman + Bonnie Whitesides7256% games+8.6% vs expected
KayeLynn BASTIAN + Jaime Vance20364% games+5.3% vs expected
KayeLynn BASTIAN + Maria Pettit5649% games+3.9% vs expected
KayeLynn BASTIAN + Jessica Whittaker121151% games+2.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jaime Vance
176W–62L career · 13 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.75
3.5
Bonnie Whitesides
40W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%88%12%
3.33
Emily Hales
90W–58L career · 12 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Jennifer Tooley
197W–228L career · 18 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Jessica Whittaker
87W–79L career · 5 lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.19
3.5
Betty Peterson
257W–369L career · 12 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
3
Diane Poole
191W–163L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.04
Lori Wilson
70W–154L career · 8 lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.91
3
Maria Pettit
187W–196L career · 14 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
Rebecca Harman
244W–303L career · 12 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84
3
KayeLynn BASTIAN
209W–244L career · 9 lines in 2023
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Elaine Day
123W–244L career · 8 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.63
Lindsey Williams
13W–16L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.