Teams

V - Rancho Madera Ace Ventura

2022 USTA Adult 18 &Over - WD Ventura · Ventura - Women 4.0 WD

18 players · average NTRP 3.89 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Alisha Shohet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
Danelle Geller
published 4
3.89
Kelly Levin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.89
Maureen Shideh
published
3.85
Athene Durrant
published 4
3.73
MJ Nejad
published
3.65
Nina Prestidge
published
3.61
Nicola Kerner
published
3.59
Lauren Koenig
published
3.58
Stacy Rubeli
published
3.56
Mikaela Nagler
published
3.51
Ghazala Trotter
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.50
Aimee Alejandre
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.48
Alona Kavinoky
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Claudia Zamora
published 4
3.27
Michelle Parent
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Christine Steele
published 3.5
3.11
Pam Nesseth
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alona Kavinoky + Alisha Shohet271355% games+0.5% vs expected
Ghazala Trotter + Alona Kavinoky6159% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Levin + Michelle Parent1540% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Levin + Aimee Alejandre3350% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Parent + Alona Kavinoky5165% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Levin + Alona Kavinoky1437% gamesnot enough data
Nina Prestidge + Athene Durrant224 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Levin + Mikaela Nagler123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alisha Shohet
174W–64L career · 1 line in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
4
Danelle Geller
28W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
4.01
Kelly Levin
99W–119L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
Maureen Shideh
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Athene Durrant
97W–70L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
MJ Nejad
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Nina Prestidge
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Nicola Kerner
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
Lauren Koenig
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
3.59
Stacy Rubeli
5W–11L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
Mikaela Nagler
26W–40L career · no lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.56
4
Ghazala Trotter
188W–183L career · 5 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Aimee Alejandre
81W–75L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.50
4
Alona Kavinoky
159W–102L career · 3 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
4
Claudia Zamora
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
3.42
3.5
Michelle Parent
104W–137L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Christine Steele
4W–15L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Pam Nesseth
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.