Teams

UPTA18A/Russell/Kroc

2026 UPTA Adult 18 & Over - USTA · 18+ Adult Men - 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-10vs UPTA18A/Brown/BrookstoneLost 13
L#1 DoublesErik Russell / Jonathan Shoultz vs Matthew Fox / Johnny Pack4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesPatrick OFriel vs David Hommes2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesXin Huang / Peter Elbaum vs JAVIER CANALES-ZAVALA / RAJ DAVE6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesNathaniel Futral vs Kainen Leer1-6, 2-6
2026-03-28vs UPTA18A/Joffe/ThornbladeLost 14
L#1 DoublesErik Russell / Scott Dickey vs Harrison Christian / Wesley Oglesby3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesPatrick OFriel vs Alex McGrath6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNathaniel Futral / Jivan Dave vs Jason Kelly / Doug Bray5-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMitch Appleby vs Jon Joffe3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesXin Huang / Peter Elbaum vs Andrew D'Agostino / Baird Hull4-6, 4-6
2026-03-14vs UPTA18A/Hart/HollyTreeLost 23
L#1 DoublesErik Russell / Sidney Key vs Doug Keel / Brett Brading3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJivan Dave vs Don Lair6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMitch Appleby / Nathaniel Futral vs Chris Hart / Jimmy ten Pas3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesPatrick OFriel vs Stone Watson6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesScott Dickey / Chris Helms vs Raj Pandya / Carl Walker6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-02-28vs UPTA (A) 4.0M 18 & Over (Gray)Lost 14
L#1 DoublesErik Russell / Sidney Key vs Rob Knapp / Samuel Moretz Chapman6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesPatrick OFriel vs Hunter Gray3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesXin Huang / Drew Corontzes vs Josh Varrie / Eli Herrnstadt6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMitch Appleby vs Austin DuBois0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJivan Dave / Peter Elbaum vs Douglas Meagher / Reilly Amason1-6, 0-6
2026-02-21vs UPTA18A/Hunter/ACACWon 32
W#1 DoublesPeter Elbaum / Xin Huang vs Garret Conover / Nils Mollenkamp2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesPatrick OFriel vs Sean Miller6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesErik Russell / Sidney Key vs Witt Compton / Luke Reynolds6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesChris Helms vs Camden Adams1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMitch Appleby / Scott Dickey vs Grant Hunter / Richard Babcock3-6, 0-6
2026-02-18vs UPTA18A/Boukedes/GCCLost 05
L#1 DoublesPatrick OFriel / Peter Elbaum vs Jeff Henry / Christopher Turner2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNathaniel Futral vs Hunter Townes1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesErik Russell / Scott Dickey vs Jeffrey Wharton / Robert Wilkins0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMitch Appleby vs Bridge Boukedes1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJonathan Shoultz / Xin Huang vs Jimmy Fiske / Collin MacKie2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 18+ Adult Men - 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA (A) 4.0M 18 & Over (Gray)5124617200
2UPTA18A/Boukedes/GCC51191128253
3UPTA18A/Joffe/Thornblade42171329260
4UPTA18A/Hunter/ACAC24111939284
5UPTA18A/Hart/HollyTree1592145313
6UPTA18A/Russell/Kroc1582247312

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Chris Helms
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.60
Drew Corontzes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Peter Elbaum
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.54
Jivan Dave
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.39
Jonathan Shoultz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Patrick OFriel
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.21
Sidney Key
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.12
Mitch Appleby
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.10
Scott Dickey
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.06
Nathaniel Futral
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.93
Erik Russell
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erik Russell + Nathaniel Futral4352% games+19.5% vs expected
Erik Russell + Sidney Key1544% games+14.1% vs expected
Scott Dickey + Erik Russell044 matchesnot enough data
Scott Dickey + Chris Helms033 matchesnot enough data
Erik Russell + Jonathan Shoultz033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Helms
18W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Drew Corontzes
19W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.60
Peter Elbaum
3W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.55
Jivan Dave
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
Jonathan Shoultz
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
Patrick OFriel
10W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.27
Sidney Key
14W–14L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.21
Mitch Appleby
1W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.12
Scott Dickey
8W–50L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
Nathaniel Futral
21W–19L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
Erik Russell
11W–35L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.