Teams

UPTA18A/Hart/HollyTree

2026 UPTA Adult 18 & Over - USTA · 18+ Adult Men - 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.71 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-08vs UPTA18A/Brown/BrookstoneLost 14
L#1 DoublesChris Hart / Jimmy ten Pas vs Andrew Pettus / Patrick Rosopa4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesDon Lair vs Kainen Leer2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBrett Brading / Doug Keel vs RAJ DAVE / Boyce Markham6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesStone Watson vs Stephen Brown3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRaj Pandya / W Scott Carlson vs Matthew Fox / Daniel Dukes2-6, 6-7
2026-03-14vs UPTA18A/Russell/KrocWon 32
W#1 DoublesDoug Keel / Brett Brading vs Erik Russell / Sidney Key6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDon Lair vs Jivan Dave4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChris Hart / Jimmy ten Pas vs Mitch Appleby / Nathaniel Futral6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesStone Watson vs Patrick OFriel7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRaj Pandya / Carl Walker vs Scott Dickey / Chris Helms4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-07vs UPTA (A) 4.0M 18 & Over (Gray)Lost 14
L#1 DoublesChris Hart / Raj Pandya vs Josh Varrie / Reilly Amason2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesStone Watson vs Austin DuBois2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBrett Brading / Doug Keel vs Rob Knapp / Bryce Geistfeld6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesDaniel Watson vs Samuel Moretz Chapman0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarl Walker / Jimmy ten Pas vs Hunter Gray / Matthew Jacques1-6, 2-6
2026-02-28vs UPTA18A/Hunter/ACACLost 13
W#1 DoublesDaniel Watson / Jimmy ten Pas vs Frank Powell / Luke Reynolds6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDon Lair vs Sean Miller0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChris Hart / Tom Wanser vs Daniel Jacques / Brian Tant0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRaj Pandya / Jay Swetenburg vs Grant Hunter / Nils Mollenkamp3-6, 4-6
2026-02-25vs UPTA18A/Boukedes/GCCLost 05
L#1 DoublesRaj Pandya / Carl Walker vs Jeff Henry / James McKissick6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesStone Watson vs Hunter Townes2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChris Hart / Jimmy ten Pas vs Christopher Turner / Matthew Vogt6-7, 1-2
L#2 SinglesDon Lair vs Bridge Boukedes2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTom Wanser / W Scott Carlson vs Jeffrey Wharton / Robert Wilkins4-6, 0-6
2026-02-18vs UPTA18A/Joffe/ThornbladeLost 13
L#1 DoublesDon Lair / Jimmy ten Pas vs Harrison Christian / Andrew D'Agostino1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChris Hart vs Jon Joffe0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesW Scott Carlson / Carl Walker vs Joe Barnes / Art Seaver6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJay Swetenburg / Raj Pandya vs Jason Kelly / Alex McGrath6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 18+ Adult Men - 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA (A) 4.0M 18 & Over (Gray)5124617200
2UPTA18A/Boukedes/GCC51191128253
3UPTA18A/Joffe/Thornblade42171329260
4UPTA18A/Hunter/ACAC24111939284
5UPTA18A/Hart/HollyTree1592145313
6UPTA18A/Russell/Kroc1582247312

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Brett Brading
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Raj Pandya
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Stone Watson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.70
Daniel Watson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.55
Jay Swetenburg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Jimmy ten Pas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.45
W Scott Carlson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Doug Keel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Tom Wanser
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Don Lair
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.24
Carl Walker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Chris Hart
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Hart + Jimmy ten Pas5266% games+34.3% vs expected
Jay Swetenburg + Raj Pandya1437% gamesnot enough data
Doug Keel + Brett Brading303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brett Brading
15W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
Raj Pandya
3W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Cameron Blackwell
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Stone Watson
3W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Daniel Watson
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Jay Swetenburg
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Jimmy ten Pas
19W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.46
W Scott Carlson
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Doug Keel
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
Tom Wanser
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
3.28
3.5
Don Lair
0W–6L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Carl Walker
7W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Chris Hart
14W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.