Teams

Richards/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.12 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-11-09vs Dannemiller/MemphisLost 14
W#1 DoublesGrace Bann / Cheryl Body vs Kelly Kitabchi / Rebecca Conrad3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTarshian Moon vs Tricia Pickett7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesVeronica Anthony / Monica Wicks vs Jessica Lancaster / Dee Bias0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMina Chung vs Lindsay Adams2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesConstance Dyson / Jennifer Sigan vs Debi Bird / Megan Green0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Grace Bann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Sophia Garrison
published
3.18
Susana Cunningham
published
3.12
Constance Dyson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
Jennifer Sigan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Sandra Richards
published
2.90
Agatha Asemota
published 3
2.81
Monica Wicks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Lora Bridgewater
published
2.80
Cheryl Body
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Veronica Anthony
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Mina Chung
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.70
Leslie Tate
published
2.68
Tarshian Moon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.32
Cheryl Patterson
published 3
Jacqueline Sharp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susana Cunningham + Veronica Anthony4356% games+6.6% vs expected
Cheryl Body + Grace Bann2442% games−12.2% vs expected
Constance Dyson + Veronica Anthony134 matchesnot enough data
Constance Dyson + Cheryl Body033 matchesnot enough data
Constance Dyson + Agatha Asemota123 matchesnot enough data
Grace Bann + Veronica Anthony123 matchesnot enough data
Monica Wicks + Veronica Anthony033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Grace Bann
31W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Sophia Garrison
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Susana Cunningham
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Constance Dyson
3W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Jennifer Sigan
19W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Sandra Richards
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.90
3
Agatha Asemota
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Monica Wicks
0W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.81
Lora Bridgewater
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
2.80
3
Cheryl Body
7W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Veronica Anthony
13W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
0%2%98%
2.80
Mina Chung
7W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Leslie Tate
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.70
Tarshian Moon
31W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.68
3
Cheryl Patterson
0W–10L career · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.32
Jacqueline Sharp
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.