← Search

Sandra Richards

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Cordova, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
182 matches · 60W–122L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history182 matches
L
2026-09-26 · Richards/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Marie Wallace
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-13 · Bann/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tarshian Moon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-09 · Bann/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christine Anderson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
Default
2026-08-25 · Echols/ Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Caitlin Bond
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-22 · Richards/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Latasha Echols
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-29 · Echols/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Grace Bann
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-28 · Richards/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alfredo Ale mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-16 · Echols/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Veronica Anthony
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-09 · Richards/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Bunch
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-5
L
2026-03-21 · Richards/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Constance Dyson
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-16 · Echols/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bianca Clayton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-09-07 · Bann/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Morgan Pippen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams97 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
0%
0W–5L · 33.7% of games
3.0
71.4%
25W–10L · 53.6% of games
3.5
23.9%
16W–51L · 40.5% of games
4.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 39.3% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
47.1%
8W–9L · 50.8% of games
7.5
4.8%
1W–20L · 30.4% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 51.1% of games
7.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 43.3% of games
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 33.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
51 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer