Teams

Do.Hovis18C

2024 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-09-23vs Li.Kempf18CLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Johnson / Christa Hochstrasser vs Christina Jenkins / Heather Tuttle1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Charlino / Jennifer Martin vs Jessica Phillips / Griffin Lamb4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLeah Curran / Rebecca Glendy vs Myra Peterson / Anna Jane Franklin6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2024-09-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesErika Plant / Mayra Rodriguez vs Claire Owens / Catherine Chavez3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-09-12vs Ka.Johnston18CLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeah Curran / Christa Hochstrasser vs Liz Chen / Megan Havel1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesErika Plant / Mayra Rodriguez vs Naomi Rodrigues / Joanne Kearney2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Charlino / Jennifer Martin vs Lindsay Murdock / Paige Alford4-6, 4-6
2024-09-09vs La.Redmond18CSplit 11
L#2 DoublesChrista Hochstrasser / Sharon Horton vs Amy Gillespie / Ellen Carey3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Martin / Stephanie Charlino vs Catherine Taylor / Susan Starnes6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-08-20vs Ju.Andrews18CLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichele Storr / Elizabeth Bieber vs Parker Rumley / Melissa Burke1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLeah Curran / Paige Boyles vs Lorah Henry / Christina Taylor3-6, 2-6
2024-08-19vs St.Grose18CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSharon Horton / Michele Storr vs Jill David / LaDonna Lee6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesErika Plant / Leah Curran vs Carol Hedley / Hope Pflaum6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2024-08-12vs Pa.Hankerson18C6.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Bieber / Paige Boyles vs Ashley McRae / Sarah Wireback1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLeah Curran / Michele Storr vs Megan Barrasso / Kelsey Barrasso6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStephanie Charlino / Jennifer Martin vs QUEEN HARGROVE / Michelle Mills3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-08-05vs Ch.Waychoff18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesSharon Horton / Michele Storr vs Becky Campbell / Beth Farrell6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Stephanie Charlino
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Leah Curran
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.15
Mayra Rodriguez
published
3.10
Sharon Horton
published
2.97
Michele Storr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.64
Paige Boyles
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.56
Christa Hochstrasser
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Erika Plant
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.40
Rebecca Glendy
published
Donna Hovis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erika Plant + Paige Boyles213 matchesnot enough data
Erika Plant + Michele Storr123 matchesnot enough data
Paige Boyles + Stephanie Charlino123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Stephanie Charlino
83W–46L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Leah Curran
108W–76L career · 5 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
Mayra Rodriguez
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%14%86%
3.15
Sharon Horton
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
3.10
3
Michele Storr
90W–76L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Paige Boyles
46W–62L career · 8 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Christa Hochstrasser
68W–118L career · 3 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Erika Plant
44W–55L career · 5 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
2.50
Rebecca Glendy
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
2.40
Donna Hovis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.