Teams

PRKR GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-07-01vs PCRK REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrenda Amundsen / Denise Dickson vs Shari Procopio / Ann Habeger6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Bull / Susan Miles vs Debra Stamatis / Jane Hetherington4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-24vs PCC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesSherri Hutcheon / Denise Dickson vs Brenda Brogan / Beth Misner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Bull / Diane Kosakowski vs Susan Martin / Ann Siebert0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHeidi Pennink / Susan Miles vs Tina Newlin / Trudy Zahler6-2, 7-6
2022-06-17vs CACI GOLDWon 21
W#1 DoublesDenise Dickson / Brenda Amundsen vs Jan McClaren / Chris Darrow6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDiane Kosakowski / Lisa Bull vs Somsi Stringer / Bea Barnes4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesHeidi Pennink / Susan Miles vs Chrysie Ready / Nanette Dahlstrom7-5, 6-3
2022-06-10vs GAC MAROONSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrenda Amundsen / Denise Dickson vs Rebecca Hite / Carrie Raben7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Bull / Heidi Pennink vs Ruth McIntyre / Lana Pierce6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-06-03vs PRKR REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrenda Amundsen / Denise Dickson vs Charlie Ghidotti / Karol Stevens6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSusan Miles / Debbie Sheehan vs Barbara Chin / Sarah Zhang0-6, 1-6
2022-05-27vs PCRK REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiane Dahm / Sherri Hutcheon vs Ann Habeger / Debra Stamatis6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLisa Bull / Diane Kosakowski vs Cindy Legrand / Barbara Gentry6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDenise Dickson / Debbie Sheehan vs Lauren Burney / Shari Procopio6-3, 6-4
2022-05-20vs PCC BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrenda Amundsen / Denise Dickson vs Jill Hanafee / Tina Newlin2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDiane Dahm / Sherri Hutcheon vs Brenda Brogan / Julie Maxwell3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Miles / Heidi Pennink vs Susan Martin / Ann Siebert0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-13vs CACI GOLDWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrenda Amundsen / Denise Dickson vs Stacey Anderson / Bea Barnes2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSherri Hutcheon / Diane Dahm vs Jan McClaren / Chris Darrow6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Bull / Diane Kosakowski vs Carla Ewing / Carol Keenan2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-05-06vs GAC MAROONLost 12
W#1 DoublesDenise Dickson / Brenda Amundsen vs Debbie Yoon / Lana Pierce0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDiane Dahm / Sherri Hutcheon vs Rebecca Hite / Suzie Erzinger6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarcia Nash / Debbie Sheehan vs Carol Nappholz / Julie Meredith2-6, 1-6
2022-04-29vs PRKR REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarcia Nash / Diane Kosakowski vs Charlie Ghidotti / Karol Stevens1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSherri Hutcheon / Diane Dahm vs Elizabeth Anderson / Dee Zimmerman5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Miles / Heidi Pennink vs Sarah Zhang / Diane Cleveland0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Brenda Amundsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Diane Dahm
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.60
Sherri Hutcheon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Denise Dickson
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 4
3.30
Marcia Nash
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Lisa Bull
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Heidi Pennink
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.04
Susan Miles
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Debbie Sheehan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Diane Kosakowski
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Dickson + Brenda Amundsen352055% games+5.0% vs expected
Diane Dahm + Sherri Hutcheon10653% games+2.1% vs expected
Heidi Pennink + Susan Miles4640% games+1.8% vs expected
Marcia Nash + Susan Miles102147% games−1.0% vs expected
Denise Dickson + Sherri Hutcheon2843% games−4.9% vs expected
Susan Miles + Lisa Bull4639% games−6.4% vs expected
Lisa Bull + Diane Kosakowski224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brenda Amundsen
69W–56L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Diane Dahm
27W–30L career · 5 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Sherri Hutcheon
43W–70L career · 6 lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
3.60
4
Denise Dickson
68W–104L career · 9 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
3.5
Marcia Nash
31W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Lisa Bull
34W–30L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Heidi Pennink
49W–105L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Miles
41W–78L career · 6 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
Debbie Sheehan
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Diane Kosakowski
8W–11L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.