Teams

PCRK RED

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-07-01vs PRKR GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesShari Procopio / Ann Habeger vs Brenda Amundsen / Denise Dickson3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDebra Stamatis / Jane Hetherington vs Lisa Bull / Susan Miles6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLauren Burney / Jody Mumaugh vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-24vs GAC MAROONLost 12
L#1 DoublesJody Mumaugh / Barbara Gentry vs Suzie Erzinger / Debbie Yoon7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCindy Legrand / Jane Hetherington vs Lana Pierce / Carol Webster1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Burney / Shari Procopio vs Carrie Raben / Mary Loughran6-2, 6-3
2022-06-17vs PRKR REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesBarbara Gentry / Cindy Legrand vs Charlie Ghidotti / Diane Cleveland7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJane Hetherington / Debra Stamatis vs Lisa Schweiss / Seanna Mulligan6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2022-06-10vs CACI GOLDWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnn Habeger / Jody Mumaugh vs Stacey Anderson / Jan McClaren6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSally Avery / Barbara Gentry vs Kimberly Kaiser / Somsi Stringer4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJane Hetherington / Debra Stamatis vs Mary Candee / Holly Kortum4-6, 5-7
2022-06-03vs PCC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesSally Avery / Ann Habeger vs Jill Hanafee / Tina Newlin7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJody Mumaugh / Barbara Gentry vs Maureen Gsand / Beth Misner4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCindy Legrand / Lauren Burney vs Julie Trent / Julie Maxwell5-3
2022-05-27vs PRKR GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnn Habeger / Debra Stamatis vs Diane Dahm / Sherri Hutcheon2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Legrand / Barbara Gentry vs Lisa Bull / Diane Kosakowski4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLauren Burney / Shari Procopio vs Denise Dickson / Debbie Sheehan3-6, 4-6
2022-05-20vs GAC MAROONLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Habeger / Jane Hetherington vs Debbie Yoon / Suzie Erzinger1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJody Mumaugh / Barbara Gentry vs Carol Webster / Carrie Raben2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSally Avery / Lauren Burney vs Julie Meredith / Rebecca Hite7-6, 7-5
2022-05-13vs PRKR REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnn Habeger / Cindy Legrand vs Diane Cleveland / Dee Zimmerman3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJane Hetherington / Lauren Burney vs Elizabeth Anderson / Sarah Zhang3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Gentry / Shari Procopio vs Karol Stevens / Lisa Schweiss7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-05-06vs CACI GOLDLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnn Habeger / Barbara Gentry vs Holly Kortum / Stacey Anderson3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSally Avery / Cindy Legrand vs Kimberly Kaiser / Mary Candee5-7, 4-6
2022-04-29vs PCC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesDebra Stamatis / Jody Mumaugh vs Tina Newlin / Jill Hanafee4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBarbara Gentry / Cindy Legrand vs Beth Misner / Ann Siebert5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSally Avery / Shari Procopio vs Beatrice NIelsen / Trudy Zahler2-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Jody Mumaugh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Jane Hetherington
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.56
Ann Habeger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Barbara Gentry
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.47
Sally Avery
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.25
Lauren Burney
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.15
Debra Stamatis
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Cindy Legrand
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Shari Procopio
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jody Mumaugh + Ann Habeger8456% games+8.3% vs expected
Sally Avery + Debra Stamatis2643% games+5.1% vs expected
Lauren Burney + Debra Stamatis0839% games+2.8% vs expected
Sally Avery + Jody Mumaugh2645% games+1.9% vs expected
Sally Avery + Ann Habeger5256% games+0.9% vs expected
Debra Stamatis + Jane Hetherington2542% games−1.4% vs expected
Lauren Burney + Ann Habeger3448% games−1.4% vs expected
Sally Avery + Barbara Gentry2745% games−1.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jody Mumaugh
81W–112L career · 6 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Jane Hetherington
16W–40L career · 6 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.63
3.5
Ann Habeger
89W–85L career · type A · 7 lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.56
3.5
Barbara Gentry
64W–118L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.50
Sally Avery
34W–67L career · 5 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Lauren Burney
27W–66L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Debra Stamatis
43W–106L career · 5 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
Cindy Legrand
3W–18L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shari Procopio
9W–37L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.