Teams

PRKR RED

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-07-01vs GAC MAROONWon 21
L#1 DoublesSeanna Mulligan / Elizabeth Anderson vs Rebecca Hite / Suzie Erzinger2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCharlie Ghidotti / Sarah Zhang vs Carol Webster / Lana Pierce6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBarbara Chin / Dee Zimmerman vs Mary Loughran / Debbie Yoon6-1, 6-3
2022-06-28vs CACI GOLDWon 30
W#1 DoublesCharlie Ghidotti / Karol Stevens vs Stacey Anderson / Bea Barnes6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDiane Cleveland / Sarah Zhang vs Mary Candee / Holly Kortum7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBarbara Chin / Lisa Schweiss vs Kimberly Kaiser / Nanette Dahlstrom6-2, 6-4
2022-06-17vs PCRK REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesCharlie Ghidotti / Diane Cleveland vs Barbara Gentry / Cindy Legrand6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Schweiss / Seanna Mulligan vs Jane Hetherington / Debra Stamatis7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-10vs PCC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesKarol Stevens / Sarah Zhang vs Jill Hanafee / Tina Newlin6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDiane Cleveland / Dee Zimmerman vs Beatrice NIelsen / Trudy Zahler6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Anderson / Seanna Mulligan vs Susan Martin / Ann Siebert4-6, 2-6
2022-06-03vs PRKR GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesCharlie Ghidotti / Karol Stevens vs Brenda Amundsen / Denise Dickson1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Anderson / Seanna Mulligan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBarbara Chin / Sarah Zhang vs Susan Miles / Debbie Sheehan6-0, 6-1
2022-05-27vs GAC MAROONWon 30
W#1 DoublesCharlie Ghidotti / Karol Stevens vs Julie Meredith / Mary Loughran6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDiane Cleveland / Sarah Zhang vs Ruth McIntyre / Suzie Erzinger6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSeanna Mulligan / Raylean Furnish vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-20vs CACI GOLDLost 12
L#1 DoublesKarol Stevens / Charlie Ghidotti vs Stacey Anderson / Somsi Stringer7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDiane Cleveland / Dee Zimmerman vs Mary Candee / Holly Kortum3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Zhang / Seanna Mulligan vs Nanette Dahlstrom / Chrysie Ready6-4, 6-3
2022-05-13vs PCRK REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiane Cleveland / Dee Zimmerman vs Ann Habeger / Cindy Legrand6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKarol Stevens / Lisa Schweiss vs Barbara Gentry / Shari Procopio7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-05-06vs PCC BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesCharlie Ghidotti / Karol Stevens vs Julie Trent / Maureen Gsand6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDiane Cleveland / Sarah Zhang vs Susan Martin / Ann Siebert6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRaylean Furnish / Lisa Schweiss vs Brenda Brogan / Beth Misner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-29vs PRKR GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesCharlie Ghidotti / Karol Stevens vs Marcia Nash / Diane Kosakowski6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Anderson / Dee Zimmerman vs Sherri Hutcheon / Diane Dahm7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSarah Zhang / Diane Cleveland vs Susan Miles / Heidi Pennink6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Karol Stevens
usually #1 Doubles 82%, also #3 Doubles 9% · published 4
3.73
Barbara Chin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Charlie Ghidotti
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
Dee Zimmerman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Diane Cleveland
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Seanna Mulligan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Lisa Schweiss
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Raylean Furnish
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charlie Ghidotti + Karol Stevens10558% games+5.0% vs expected
Diane Cleveland + Dee Zimmerman3448% gamesnot enough data
Raylean Furnish + Lisa Schweiss314 matchesnot enough data
Dee Zimmerman + Lisa Schweiss134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Karol Stevens
130W–55L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Barbara Chin
50W–33L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Charlie Ghidotti
131W–52L career · 8 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Dee Zimmerman
45W–46L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Diane Cleveland
13W–14L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Seanna Mulligan
30W–56L career · 6 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Lisa Schweiss
9W–13L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Raylean Furnish
6W–19L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.