Teams

MBurns (Jeff Adams)

2024 Tri-Level 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 2.5

11 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-06-27vs SWhitney/NHaskins (Park Road)Split 11
L#2 DoublesMallory Burns / Madelynn Bates vs Trisha Hyso / Karen Moss1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesGabby Cirigliano / Doga Karyaldiz vs Brooks Herman / Rebecca Musante6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2024-06-20vs MTurturro/LBottle (OPRC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDoga Karyaldiz / Jennifer Moore vs Lisa Bottle / Molly Cook7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-06-19vs SChandler/Koesel (RTCC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMadelynn Bates / Katherine Stencel vs Stacy Andrews / Suzanne Austin3-6, 3-6
2024-06-13Lost 01
L#2 DoublesStephanie Qunbar / Doga Karyaldiz vs Katrina Richards / Nicole Love4-6, 0-6
2024-05-30vs ABroemel (Queens)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLindsay Fleharty / Doga Karyaldiz vs Sara Ash / Kelsey Davis6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Elizabeth Miars
published
3.05
Emilia Anderson
published
3.00
Madelynn Bates
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.93
Mallory Burns
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.59
Stephanie Qunbar
published
2.56
Lindsay Fleharty
published
2.49
Janette Billings
published
2.40
Doga Karyaldiz
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.34
Gabby Cirigliano
published
Emma Browder
published
Katherine Stencel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mallory Burns + Doga Karyaldiz224 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Qunbar + Janette Billings123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Miars
16W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.13
Emilia Anderson
37W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.05
3
Madelynn Bates
53W–35L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Mallory Burns
45W–67L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.93
Stephanie Qunbar
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%25%75%
2.59
Lindsay Fleharty
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
0%34%66%
2.56
Janette Billings
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
0%54%46%
2.49
2.5
Doga Karyaldiz
23W–38L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%77%23%
2.40
Gabby Cirigliano
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
2.34
Emma Browder
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katherine Stencel
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.