Teams

ABroemel (Queens)

2024 Tri-Level 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 2.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-01vs MTurturro/LBottle (OPRC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesAbbey Ellis / Katherine Koppel-Dobbs vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAllison Broemel / Rachel Miller vs Eileen Jones / Stacey Valitchka6-2, 7-6
2024-07-11vs JHarling (Jeff Adams)Split 11
W#1 DoublesAbbey Ellis / Katherine Koppel-Dobbs vs Miriam Manga / Susan Hitchens7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAllison Broemel / Rachel Miller vs Gianna Elden / Krystal Carmichael4-6, 6-7
2024-06-27Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAbbey Ellis / Morgan Simon vs Lesley Quick / Megan Hua Shaul3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRachel Miller / Kait Beck vs Karen Allen / Katrina Richards3-6, 2-6
2024-06-20vs LMadonna/PTrantham (WSRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAllison Broemel / Kait Beck vs Pamela Trantham / Tracey Hunt6-2, 6-2
2024-06-18Split 11
W#1 DoublesAbbey Ellis / Katherine Koppel-Dobbs vs Nikki Haskins / Stacey Whitney6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAllison Broemel / Kait Beck vs Karen Moss / Trisha Hyso3-6, 3-6
2024-06-13vs SChandler/Koesel (RTCC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKait Beck / Kathryn Pride vs Stacy Andrews / Jenny Carlson2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-05-30vs MBurns (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMorgan Simon / Abbey Ellis vs Emma Browder / Nidhi Lakkadi6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
3.24
Abbey Ellis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Kelsey Davis
published
2.94
Allison Broemel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Kait Beck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Kathryn Pride
published
2.92
Marissa Connolly
published
2.83
Paige MacEra
published
2.76
Sara Ash
published
2.68
Jen Mugnano
published 3
2.66
Anna Sison
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Ash + Marissa Connolly7357% games+12.0% vs expected
Allison Broemel + Kait Beck91446% games+2.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Koppel-Dobbs
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Abbey Ellis
49W–43L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Kelsey Davis
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Allison Broemel
65W–92L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
2.94
3
Kait Beck
45W–68L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
2.94
Kathryn Pride
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
2.94
Marissa Connolly
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
2.92
Paige MacEra
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.83
Sara Ash
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%3%97%
2.76
3
Jen Mugnano
17W–22L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Anna Sison
0W–8L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.