Teams

HG Gang Green - E. Collins

2024 Hillsborough Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.70 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-03vs Hills/Schneider/50&Over7.5MLost 02
L#1 DoublesSean Friday / Ken Kranick vs Brian Stone / Gvozden Dokic3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEddie Collins / Doug Angelone vs Sylvain Gauthier / Jacob Munch2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-10-20Won 10
W#2 DoublesGregory Morrissey / Ken Kranick vs Marvin Jones / Richard Warrener6-3, 6-2
2024-10-13vs Hills/Schneider/50&Over7.5MLost 02
L#1 DoublesEddie Collins / Ken Kranick vs Chris Donahue / Sylvain Gauthier0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristopher Baker / Sean Friday vs Jason Lee / James Schneider6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-09-29Won 10
W#3 DoublesChristopher Baker / Gregory Morrissey vs Marvin Jones / Terry Lamphier7-5, 6-4
2024-09-22vs Hills/Schneider/50&Over7.5MLost 01
L#2 DoublesDoug Angelone / Gregory Morrissey vs Erik Breitenbach / Jacob Munch3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Eddie Collins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.52
Gregory Morrissey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.40
Christopher Baker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Chris Burdge
published 3.5
3.35
Doug Angelone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Sean Friday
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Ken Kranick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John Cotey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doug Angelone + Chris Burdge6062% games+10.1% vs expected
John Cotey + Doug Angelone314 matchesnot enough data
Chris Burdge + Ken Kranick314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eddie Collins
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Gregory Morrissey
131W–125L career · 3 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Christopher Baker
16W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Chris Burdge
15W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Doug Angelone
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.35
Sean Friday
13W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.30
Ken Kranick
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
John Cotey
16W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.