Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Day/Torres

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W PM

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-31Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMolly Adams / Jamie DeLong vs Amber Thompson / Tiffany Zarbock3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesCatherine van Uitert vs Jennifer Sampson1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesMolly Adams / Rebecca Harman vs Hannah Lee / Nancy Sparrer6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShannon Halverson / Jamie DeLong vs Shelly Kemp / Ann Trentman3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesCatherine van Uitert vs Grace Lin6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2023-05-17Won 20
W#1 SinglesShannon Halverson vs Gelyn Pauly6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNicole Huston / Molly Adams vs Kate Franko / Kalaiselvi Seetharaman6-2, 7-5
2023-05-10vs Liberty Park Tennis-Stacey/EwingSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMaria Pettit / Catherine van Uitert vs Sara Ray / LaNece Andreason1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMolly Adams / Shannon Halverson vs Kathi Poggi / Kristen Treanor6-4, 6-3
2023-05-03Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMolly Adams / Jamie DeLong vs Kim Cronin / Jeanette Shepard2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesElaine Day / Shannon Halverson vs Maria Lombardi / Michelle Maxfield3-6, 3-6
2023-04-26vs Liberty Park Tennis-Byington/SmithLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine van Uitert / Michelle Monson vs Amy Rosevear / Kathleen Saunders7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesShannon Halverson vs Michelle Barton2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAja-Lynn Domingo / Molly Adams vs Sundi Brown / Linda Byington3-6, 1-6
2023-04-22Lost 01
L#2 DoublesElaine Day / Molly Adams vs Inga Nelson / Allison Christenson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-04-12vs Liberty Park Tennis-LeikenWon 10
W#1 DoublesMolly Adams / Michelle Monson vs Katie Leikin / Madelyn Totland7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Kassie Torres
published 4
3.39
Catherine van Uitert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Bessy Nielson
usually #3 Doubles 31%, also #1 Singles 23% · published 3.5
3.22
Jamie DeLong
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published 3.5
3.16
Betty Peterson
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #2 Singles 23% · published 3.5
2.95
Rikke Phinney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.91
Lori Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.86
Shannon Halverson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.85
Maria Pettit
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.84
Rebecca Harman
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Elaine Day
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.42
Melanie Decker
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Lindsey Williams
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Molly Adams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Nicole Huston
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Adams + Kassie Torres7355% games+13.1% vs expected
Jamie DeLong + Nicole Huston15564% games+11.1% vs expected
Rebecca Harman + Molly Adams8453% games+8.9% vs expected
Kassie Torres + Jamie DeLong121053% games+6.9% vs expected
Maria Pettit + Jamie DeLong4257% games+4.0% vs expected
Lori Wilson + Rebecca Harman41641% games+1.8% vs expected
Elaine Day + Kassie Torres4252% games+1.7% vs expected
Rebecca Harman + Lindsey Williams2449% games+0.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kassie Torres
180W–119L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Catherine van Uitert
50W–45L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Bessy Nielson
213W–160L career · 13 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Jamie DeLong
171W–129L career · 11 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Betty Peterson
257W–369L career · 12 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
Rikke Phinney
45W–49L career · 6 lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
2.95
Lori Wilson
70W–154L career · 8 lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.91
3
Shannon Halverson
25W–43L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.86
3
Maria Pettit
187W–196L career · 14 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
Rebecca Harman
244W–303L career · 12 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Elaine Day
123W–244L career · 8 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Melanie Decker
49W–170L career · 12 lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
2.42
Lindsey Williams
13W–16L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Molly Adams
101W–77L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicole Huston
37W–23L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.