Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Byington/Smith

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W PM

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesLindsey Metcalf / Courtney Thompson vs Carla Stoddard / Hannah Lee6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMichelle Barton vs Grace Lin6-7, 0-5
W#3 DoublesLinda Byington / Becky Smith vs Terri Brunner / Nancy Sparrer6-2, 6-2
2023-05-24Won 20
W#1 DoublesLinda Byington / Becky Smith vs Gelyn Pauly / Miranda Tilley6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSundi Brown vs Jane Chandramouli6-3, 6-4
2023-05-22Won 21
W#1 DoublesLinda Byington / Brenda Whicker vs Namrata Handlon / Shoeleh Assemi5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSundi Brown / Lindsey Metcalf vs Lindsay Andersen / Michelle Weddington6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesHeather Bratcher vs Jennie Bethers4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-05-17Won 21
W#1 DoublesLindsey Metcalf / Courtney Thompson vs Mindi Paskins / Kelly Webster7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLinda Byington / Michelle Barton vs Jennie Stacey / Heather Sliwa3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesHeather Bratcher vs Aislynn Hoang6-1, 6-4
2023-04-26vs Liberty Park Tennis-Day/TorresWon 30
W#1 SinglesMichelle Barton vs Shannon Halverson6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSundi Brown / Linda Byington vs Aja-Lynn Domingo / Molly Adams6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesHeather Bratcher vs Bessy Nielson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-04-22Lost 02
L#1 SinglesCourtney Thompson vs Amber Thompson7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesHeather Bratcher vs Tiffany Zarbock1-6, 3-6
2023-04-19vs Liberty Park Tennis-LeikenWon 21
L#1 DoublesCourtney Thompson / Linda Byington vs Katie Leikin / Madelyn Totland3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSundi Brown / Michelle Barton vs Stephanie Benton / Nicole Chase0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLindsey Metcalf vs Alison Pearce6-2, 6-2
2023-04-12Split 11
W#1 DoublesCourtney Thompson / Brenda Whicker vs Kristen Okland / Audrey Dufel6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichelle Barton / Nicole Leatham vs Mindy Christensen / Melissa Ford5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.5W PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sports Mall-Lake8032821257
2Liberty Park Tennis-Byington/Smith62221844361
3Liberty Park Tennis-Larkin/Carruthers53202047368
4Liberty Park Tennis-Stebbing/Shoff35192146357

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Amy Rosevear
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.65
Lindsey Metcalf
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.61
Heather Bratcher
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.40
Becky Smith
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Brenda Whicker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Courtney Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.08
Carolyn Cottle
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published 3.5
3.07
Alexis Smith
usually #1 Singles 82%, also #3 Doubles 9% · published 4
3.06
Linda Byington
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Nicole Leatham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Angela Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Michelle Barton
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Sundi Brown
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Becky Smith + Linda Byington5266% games+18.6% vs expected
Lindsey Metcalf + Amy Rosevear291259% games+2.8% vs expected
Nicole Leatham + Linda Byington9261% games+1.9% vs expected
Angela Jensen + Carolyn Cottle1443% games+1.6% vs expected
Linda Byington + Brenda Whicker5354% games+1.1% vs expected
Lindsey Metcalf + Sundi Brown404 matchesnot enough data
Linda Byington + Sundi Brown224 matchesnot enough data
Heather Bratcher + Becky Smith303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Rosevear
90W–58L career · 11 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
Lindsey Metcalf
75W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Heather Bratcher
118W–76L career · 4 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Becky Smith
70W–58L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Brenda Whicker
15W–9L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Courtney Thompson
5W–3L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Carolyn Cottle
113W–130L career · 11 lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
3.08
4
Alexis Smith
114W–71L career · 11 lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.07
Linda Byington
72W–70L career · 6 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.06
Nicole Leatham
106W–119L career · 12 lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Angela Jensen
96W–96L career · 14 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
2.63
Michelle Barton
11W–14L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sundi Brown
36W–23L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.