Teams

HRCA BLUE

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-25vs KC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Burshtan / Phyllis Gaskill vs Gina Akins / Kelly Mair1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Rood / Judith Delein vs Danette Henderson / Lori Goulding3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBarbara Chapman / Irene Scott vs Janet McMahon / Kathy Owens6-4, 7-6
2021-06-18vs PH REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesIrene Scott / Jan Scanlan vs Beth Wright / Colleen Powell6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnn Burshtan / Phyllis Gaskill vs Nancy Branigan / Nhung Van1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBarbara Chapman / Carole LaBounty vs Jane Carlson / Lori Silliman7-6, 7-5
2021-06-11vs BCST PURPLEWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarole LaBounty / Irene Scott vs Janis Owens / Clara Mizenko6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAnn Burshtan / Phyllis Gaskill vs Sharon Ehler / Kathleen Antony5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJudith Delein / Donna Rood vs Tracy Rotter / Jeanine Martinez6-1, 6-2
2021-06-04vs HRCA PINKLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Chapman / Carole LaBounty vs Lynne Monnar / Stephanee Schlachtenhaufen0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesIrene Scott / Ann Burshtan vs Zada Cunningham / Kathy Breth1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRosemarie Kucharski / Phyllis Gaskill vs Barbara Adamson / Linda Backus1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-05-28vs KC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesJudith Delein / Irene Scott vs Judy Greco / Lisa Benhammou-Osur6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarole LaBounty / Barbara Chapman vs Margaret Hart / Ana Tolentino6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRosemarie Kucharski / Phyllis Gaskill vs Kathy Knudsen / Janet Raban6-1, 6-0
2021-05-21vs LEBTC ORANGEWon 21
L#1 DoublesIrene Scott / Phyllis Gaskill vs Diana Rouse / Nancy Wood3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJan Scanlan / Rosemarie Kucharski vs Sudy Opsahl / Kathy Noll6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJudith Delein / Donna Rood vs Joanne Holden / Judy Marshall6-2, 6-2
2021-05-14vs CK BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbara Chapman / Carole LaBounty vs Kathryn Dann / Jennifer Harrop6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJan Scanlan / Donna Rood vs Mary LeSueur / Alison Rochelle2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesIrene Scott / Mary Sheedy vs Jane Miley / Kathleen Wilhite6-0, 6-2
2021-05-07vs LEBTC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Burshtan / Donna Rood vs Becki Jernigan / Lori Lee1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesBarbara Chapman / Carole LaBounty vs Kathleen Beyes / Soonie Yim6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJan Scanlan / Mary Sheedy vs Janie Magyar / Suzanne Kwilman0-6, 4-6
2021-04-30vs GNO TEALLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Sheedy / Jan Scanlan vs Jacalyn Peter / Pamela Coe1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPhyllis Gaskill / Ann Burshtan vs Gaytral Ackerman / Deanne Vizurraga0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJudith Delein / Rosemarie Kucharski vs Jill Wichlens / Kim Collins2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.74
Carole LaBounty
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Rosemarie Kucharski
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Barbara Chapman
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Irene Scott
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.30
Donna Rood
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Carmen Mould
published
Jan Scanlan
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Judith Delein
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Phyllis Gaskill
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Chapman + Carole LaBounty181258% games+0.8% vs expected
Irene Scott + Carole LaBounty6649% gamesnot enough data
Judith Delein + Donna Rood2447% gamesnot enough data
Judith Delein + Rosemarie Kucharski123 matchesnot enough data
Jan Scanlan + Irene Scott123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carole LaBounty
56W–41L career · 6 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Rosemarie Kucharski
30W–42L career · 4 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Barbara Chapman
22W–19L career · 6 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Irene Scott
55W–57L career · 7 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
2.69
3
Donna Rood
17W–48L career · 5 lines in 2021
93%7%<1%
2.30
Carmen Mould
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jan Scanlan
4W–6L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Judith Delein
15W–14L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Phyllis Gaskill
3W–7L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.