Teams

KC BLUE

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-25vs HRCA BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesGina Akins / Kelly Mair vs Ann Burshtan / Phyllis Gaskill6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDanette Henderson / Lori Goulding vs Donna Rood / Judith Delein6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJanet McMahon / Kathy Owens vs Barbara Chapman / Irene Scott4-6, 6-7
2021-06-18vs GNO TEALWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaria Fischer / Lisa McNeal vs Pamela Coe / Jacalyn Peter5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristie Mann / Jennifer Manta vs Gaytral Ackerman / Tamara Barron7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKelly Mair / Janet McMahon vs Jennifer Atkinson / Jill Wichlens6-3, 6-4
2021-06-11vs PH REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesGina Akins / Christie Mann vs Joyce Anderson / Doris Wedemann6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLisa McNeal / Maria Fischer vs Carolyn Keim / Colleen Powell6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKathy Owens / Kelly Mair vs Christina Lawson / Nancy Waas6-3, 6-4
2021-06-04vs BCST PURPLEWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa McNeal / Maria Fischer vs Kimberly Lange / Clara Mizenko6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLori Goulding / Jennifer Manta vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Mair / Kathy Owens vs Kathleen Antony / Jeanine Martinez6-1, 6-0
2021-05-28vs HRCA PINKWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa McNeal / Maria Fischer vs Zada Cunningham / Kathy Breth5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGina Akins / Jennifer Manta vs Fauna MacKillip / Carol Avery6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKathy Owens / Kelly Mair vs Lynne Monnar / Stephanee Schlachtenhaufen2-6, 1-6
2021-05-21vs KC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesLori Goulding / Jennifer Manta vs Cassie Klumpp / Ana Tolentino6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJanet McMahon / Alicia Hovland vs Judy Greco / Donata Reeser6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDanette Henderson / Christie Mann vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-14vs LEBTC ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Manta / Christie Mann vs Sudy Opsahl / Judy Marshall6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Mair / Alicia Hovland vs Joanne Holden / Diana Rouse7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDanette Henderson / Kathy Owens vs Kathy Noll / Nancy Wood6-2, 6-1
2021-05-07vs CK BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesGina Akins / Lori Goulding vs Jennifer Harrop / Kathryn Dann6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristie Mann / Jennifer Manta vs Ellen McClurkin / Alison Rochelle6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAlicia Hovland / Janet McMahon vs Debra Frye / Jane Miley6-4, 6-3
2021-04-30vs LEBTC REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesMaria Fischer / Lisa McNeal vs Catherine Zeberlein / Kellie Naclerio6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGina Akins / Kathy Owens vs Denise Debartolomeis / Allison Langenderfer3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDanette Henderson / Janet McMahon vs Vickie Conroy / Becki Jernigan4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Gina Akins
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.75
Jennifer Manta
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.74
Lori Goulding
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Christie Mann
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.72
Maria Fischer
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.71
Kelly Mair
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.63
Danette Henderson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Kathy Owens
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Janet McMahon
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Lisa McNeal
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Marlene Samokishyn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Goulding + Danette Henderson9464% games+7.1% vs expected
Maria Fischer + Lisa McNeal201156% games+2.1% vs expected
Maria Fischer + Jennifer Manta7364% games+1.4% vs expected
Christie Mann + Jennifer Manta6162% games−0.3% vs expected
Jennifer Manta + Gina Akins5352% games−4.1% vs expected
Danette Henderson + Kelly Mair2346% games−4.6% vs expected
Lori Goulding + Jennifer Manta3256% gamesnot enough data
Lori Goulding + Gina Akins314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Gina Akins
91W–50L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
2.93
Jennifer Manta
57W–26L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Lori Goulding
101W–55L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Christie Mann
54W–36L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74
Maria Fischer
48W–22L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Kelly Mair
54W–48L career · 6 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Danette Henderson
25W–21L career · type A · 3 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
2.63
Kathy Owens
42W–79L career · 6 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
2.63
Janet McMahon
8W–16L career · 10 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lisa McNeal
30W–16L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Marlene Samokishyn
12W–23L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.