Teams

CK BLUE

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 2.92 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-25vs BCST PURPLEWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathryn Dann / Jennifer Harrop vs Tracy Rotter / Clara Mizenko6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesEllen McClurkin / Mary Barnett vs Kathleen Antony / Jeanine Martinez6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSally Bennett / Kathleen Wilhite vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-18vs HRCA PINKLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebra Frye / Mary LeSueur vs Carol Avery / Fauna MacKillip2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMary Barnett / Kathleen Wilhite vs Linda Backus / Maria Hush1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKathryn Dann / Jennifer Harrop vs Zada Cunningham / Barbara Adamson6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2021-06-11vs KC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesEllen McClurkin / Alison Rochelle vs Janet Raban / Ruth Wilken6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDebra Frye / Jane Miley vs Cassie Klumpp / Margaret Hart6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMary Barnett / Mary LeSueur vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-04vs LEBTC ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Harrop / Alison Rochelle vs Diana Rouse / Janice Ross6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMary LeSueur / Sally Bennett vs Judy Marshall / Nancy Wood5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMary Barnett / Kathleen Wilhite vs Kathy Noll / Bonnie Teymouri6-3, 6-2
2021-05-28vs GNO TEALLost 12
L#1 DoublesSally Bennett / Ellen McClurkin vs Pamela Coe / Jacalyn Peter2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKathryn Dann / Mary LeSueur vs Ana Law / Nancy Post7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMary Barnett / Kathleen Wilhite vs Gaytral Ackerman / Jill Wichlens5-7, 5-7
2021-05-21vs LEBTC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesDebra Frye / Jane Miley vs Vickie Conroy / Kellie Naclerio2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEllen McClurkin / Alison Rochelle vs Catherine Zeberlein / Allison Langenderfer2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Harrop / Sally Bennett vs Becki Jernigan / Janie Magyar7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2021-05-14vs HRCA BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathryn Dann / Jennifer Harrop vs Barbara Chapman / Carole LaBounty3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary LeSueur / Alison Rochelle vs Jan Scanlan / Donna Rood6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJane Miley / Kathleen Wilhite vs Irene Scott / Mary Sheedy0-6, 2-6
2021-05-07vs KC BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Harrop / Kathryn Dann vs Gina Akins / Lori Goulding3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEllen McClurkin / Alison Rochelle vs Christie Mann / Jennifer Manta4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDebra Frye / Jane Miley vs Alicia Hovland / Janet McMahon4-6, 3-6
2021-04-30vs PH REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesEllen McClurkin / Alison Rochelle vs Joyce Anderson / Bobbie Mantey6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDebra Frye / Jane Miley vs Jane Carlson / Doris Wedemann3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKathryn Dann / Jennifer Harrop vs Gail Fritzinger / Nhung Van7-6, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.69
Kathryn Dann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Ellen McClurkin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.58
Debra Frye
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.48
Jennifer Harrop
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.42
Mary LeSueur
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
1.90
Kathleen Wilhite
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Alison Rochelle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jane Miley
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Sally Bennett
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Harrop + Kathryn Dann453952% games−2.9% vs expected
Mary LeSueur + Ellen McClurkin11752% games−10.2% vs expected
Ellen McClurkin + Alison Rochelle5456% gamesnot enough data
Mary LeSueur + Kathryn Dann3550% gamesnot enough data
Mary LeSueur + Alison Rochelle4354% gamesnot enough data
Mary LeSueur + Debra Frye3247% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Wilhite + Kathryn Dann224 matchesnot enough data
Mary LeSueur + Sally Bennett224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kathryn Dann
67W–57L career · 6 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Ellen McClurkin
30W–32L career · 6 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
2.62
3
Debra Frye
29W–36L career · type A · 5 lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
2.58
3
Jennifer Harrop
57W–52L career · 7 lines in 2021
55%45%<1%
2.48
3
Mary LeSueur
46W–68L career · 5 lines in 2021
73%27%<1%
2.42
2.5
Kathleen Wilhite
32W–72L career · 5 lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Alison Rochelle
17W–18L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jane Miley
4W–24L career · 10 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sally Bennett
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.