Teams

LeDoux/18/7.5/PAC

2026 Man · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Flight standings4 teams · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LeDoux/18/7.5/PAC2042648
2Scott/18s/7.5/FAC1142542
3Dodson/18s/7.5/BC1133849
4Downing/18s/7.5/SC02151171

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Amy Burdette
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published 4
3.79
Vicky Martin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Abby Hunt
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published 3.5
3.48
April Luscy
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.43
Alecia Seastrunk
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Kacey Zillner
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Marta Brasseaux
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Merritt Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Patricia Schultz
usually #1 Doubles 65%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published
Regina Knight
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
Shannon Enk
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Shannon LeDoux
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Victoria Bienvenu
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Merritt Edwards + Shannon Enk4355% gamesnot enough data
Regina Knight + Merritt Edwards1440% gamesnot enough data
Kacey Zillner + Shannon Enk224 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Enk + Marta Brasseaux134 matchesnot enough data
Abby Hunt + Marta Brasseaux404 matchesnot enough data
April Luscy + Patricia Schultz303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Burdette
29W–14L career · 26 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
Vicky Martin
15W–8L career · 9 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
3.5
Abby Hunt
36W–9L career · 28 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.61
4
April Luscy
12W–13L career · 13 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Alecia Seastrunk
14W–12L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
Kacey Zillner
12W–4L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marta Brasseaux
14W–14L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Merritt Edwards
29W–18L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Schultz
15W–9L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Regina Knight
16W–19L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shannon Enk
45W–27L career · 37 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shannon LeDoux
11W–12L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Victoria Bienvenu
8W–6L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.