Teams

Dodson/18s/7.5/BC

2026 Man · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day

18 players · average NTRP 3.67 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Flight standings4 teams · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LeDoux/18/7.5/PAC2042648
2Scott/18s/7.5/FAC1142542
3Dodson/18s/7.5/BC1133849
4Downing/18s/7.5/SC02151171

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Cherie Pausina
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.83
Bridgette Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 90%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published 4
3.44
Amy Malloy
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Celeste Collins
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.29
Courtney Dodson
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.01
Casey Upton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Erinn Legendre
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Japonica Cruise
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Katherine Hodgins
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Katie Kabrich
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lauren Parks
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
Lindsay Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lindsay Maxedon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Lisa Hamaker
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Mary Toce
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 41% · published
Michelle Pecoraro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca MacMaster
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Violeta Daskalova
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bridgette Taylor + Celeste Collins2447% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Hamaker + Bridgette Taylor2353% gamesnot enough data
Japonica Cruise + Katherine Hodgins2345% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Pecoraro + Celeste Collins2343% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Parks + Lindsay Maxedon3268% gamesnot enough data
Amy Malloy + Celeste Collins224 matchesnot enough data
Erinn Legendre + Lindsay Maxedon224 matchesnot enough data
Violeta Daskalova + Bridgette Taylor134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cherie Pausina
14W–18L career · 14 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Bridgette Taylor
14W–21L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
3.5
Amy Malloy
32W–17L career · 18 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.44
3.5
Celeste Collins
32W–31L career · 21 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Courtney Dodson
18W–15L career · 11 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Casey Upton
1W–5L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.01
Erinn Legendre
22W–20L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Japonica Cruise
16W–13L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
Katherine Hodgins
25W–18L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Katie Kabrich
10W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lauren Parks
27W–5L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lindsay Johnson
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lindsay Maxedon
26W–15L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Hamaker
6W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Toce
30W–23L career · 22 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Pecoraro
11W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Rebecca MacMaster
13W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Violeta Daskalova
35W–28L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.