Teams

Downing/18s/7.5/SC

2026 Man · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Flight standings4 teams · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LeDoux/18/7.5/PAC2042648
2Scott/18s/7.5/FAC1142542
3Dodson/18s/7.5/BC1133849
4Downing/18s/7.5/SC02151171

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Christina Ward
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Singles 42% · published 3.5
2.95
Alison Beebe
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Jamie Quartano
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Janel Gray
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Janel Tedesco
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kelly Slimming
usually #1 Singles 30%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Kimberly Darr
usually #1 Doubles 37%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Brumfield
published
Mary Elise Schof
usually #2 Doubles 32%, also #1 Singles 23% · published
Melissa Biggs
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Rhonda Simmons
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Sally Dane Sperry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Stephanie Rolling
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Suzanne Parke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Vonda Downing
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Darr + Alison Beebe10656% gamesnot enough data
Mary Elise Schof + Jamie Quartano6169% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Slimming + Jamie Quartano6065% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Darr + Jamie Quartano5072% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Darr + Kelly Slimming134 matchesnot enough data
Janel Tedesco + Jamie Quartano303 matchesnot enough data
Alison Beebe + Kelly Slimming303 matchesnot enough data
Alison Beebe + Mary Elise Schof213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christina Ward
23W–13L career · 12 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Alison Beebe
54W–27L career · 35 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
Jamie Quartano
52W–1L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
Janel Gray
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Janel Tedesco
15W–9L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kelly Slimming
43W–34L career · 33 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kimberly Darr
46W–26L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Brumfield
0W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Elise Schof
36W–27L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Biggs
15W–24L career · 30 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rhonda Simmons
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sally Dane Sperry
2W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Rolling
23W–15L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data
Suzanne Parke
4W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Vonda Downing
5W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.