Teams

V - Wood Ranch Thorns N Roses

2023 USTA Mixed 40 &Over · V - Mixed 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesErik Houser / Stella Dumlao-Idea vs Lauren Napoli / Jim Brown4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer House / Burke Franklin vs Sonia Bekian / Ali Motamedi6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLarry Haywood / Patricia Ameca vs Daniel Whitney / Erin Brubach7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesBurke Franklin / Summer Williamson vs Sandhya Patel / Amit Joshi7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-06vs V - Las Posas LigersWon 20
W#2 DoublesPatricia Ameca / Larry Haywood vs Gina Howey / Clinton Cates6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesStella Dumlao-Idea / Melvin Welch vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-28vs V - DAM Ball WACkersWon 10
W#2 DoublesEdward Sedo / Patricia Ameca vs Mary Scotti / Devin Cardona7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2023-04-22vs V - Sunset Hot ShotsLost 01
L#1 DoublesPeter DiPasquale / Patricia Ameca vs Cory Rodrigues / Janice Pinnell3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for V - Mixed 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Lan Chao
published
3.69
Summer Williamson
published
3.61
Erik Houser
published
3.48
Burke Franklin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.44
Patricia Ameca
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Bradley Johnson
published 4
3.17
Peter DiPasquale
published
2.83
Stella Dumlao-Idea
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.57
Deborah Singer
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Ameca + Burke Franklin3452% gamesnot enough data
Stella Dumlao-Idea + Burke Franklin303 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Ameca + Peter DiPasquale123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lan Chao
23W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.88
Summer Williamson
48W–26L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
3.69
Erik Houser
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Burke Franklin
157W–97L career · 2 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Patricia Ameca
113W–92L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%65%34%
3.44
4
Bradley Johnson
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
3.38
Peter DiPasquale
9W–25L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Stella Dumlao-Idea
180W–184L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Deborah Singer
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.