Teams

Servaces

2025 OKCAdult 40 & Over League · 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.92 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings4 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OK/Cue-Day/40&over4.0M120481234429
2No Fault84372355496
3Tran/Stokes57312966538
4Servaces0121050106682

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Brent Harris
published 4
Chad Feller
published 4
3.66
JOHN BANAS
published
3.62
Gregory Jungman
published
3.58
Cullen Morrow
published 4
3.57
Scott Brockman
published
3.56
Tim Jungman
published
3.53
Greg Burge
published
3.51
Brent Swift
published 4
3.43
Clay Royder
published 4
Conrad Charalampous
published 3.5
3.21
Matthew Green
published
3.16
Justin Franklin
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.06
Kenneth Hancock
published
Ken Ellinger
published
Lance Williams
published
Scott Edwards
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brent Harris + Scott Brockman3256% games+5.8% vs expected
Justin Franklin + Kenneth Hancock0935% games+1.0% vs expected
Greg Burge + Scott Brockman2345% games−0.2% vs expected
Justin Franklin + Clay Royder0630% games−2.7% vs expected
Justin Franklin + Matthew Green0532% games−3.3% vs expected
Cullen Morrow + Tim Jungman4548% games−5.0% vs expected
JOHN BANAS + Greg Burge71444% games−6.6% vs expected
Chad Feller + Justin Franklin0839% games−7.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brent Harris
13W–19L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Chad Feller
22W–82L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
JOHN BANAS
14W–28L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Gregory Jungman
10W–22L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Cullen Morrow
18W–34L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Scott Brockman
64W–43L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.57
Tim Jungman
12W–34L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
Greg Burge
48W–43L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Brent Swift
19W–41L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
4
Clay Royder
11W–52L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Conrad Charalampous
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Green
12W–91L career · no lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.21
Justin Franklin
36W–81L career · 7 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Kenneth Hancock
18W–63L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Ken Ellinger
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lance Williams
16W–23L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Edwards
4W–16L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.