Teams

No Fault

2025 OKCAdult 40 & Over League · 4.0

18 players · average NTRP 4.00 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings4 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OK/Cue-Day/40&over4.0M120481234429
2No Fault84372355496
3Tran/Stokes57312966538
4Servaces0121050106682

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Rip Royse
usually #1 Singles 20%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.84
Mark Carlin
published
3.83
Khiem Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.83
Bryan Veit
published 4
3.82
Eric Hays
published 4
3.81
Peter Pappas
published
3.78
Neil Molina
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Brandon Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Jeffrey Bowser
published
3.74
David Dustmann
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
David Ogle
published 4
3.66
Russell Stafford
published
3.65
Matt Baldwin
published
3.63
Bill Towler
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Gary Broxterman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Grant Woody
published 4
3.55
Mark Neumeister
published
Ken Burkhart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Ogle + Neil Molina4255% games+11.0% vs expected
Rip Royse + Bryan Veit10260% games+10.6% vs expected
David Ogle + Brandon Stewart4154% games+9.8% vs expected
Brandon Stewart + Neil Molina4349% games+5.1% vs expected
David Dustmann + Khiem Nguyen8557% games+4.7% vs expected
Brandon Stewart + David Dustmann121151% games+4.2% vs expected
Rip Royse + David Ogle5157% games+2.7% vs expected
Rip Royse + Neil Molina151154% games+1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rip Royse
92W–101L career · 4 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.98
Mark Carlin
29W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.84
Khiem Nguyen
22W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.83
4
Bryan Veit
35W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Eric Hays
46W–30L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.82
Peter Pappas
103W–29L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.81
Neil Molina
105W–74L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Brandon Stewart
135W–85L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Jeffrey Bowser
113W–82L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
David Dustmann
36W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
4
David Ogle
123W–100L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Russell Stafford
16W–21L career · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.66
Matt Baldwin
125W–87L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.65
4
Bill Towler
49W–79L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.63
4
Gary Broxterman
95W–76L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Grant Woody
92W–61L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.60
Mark Neumeister
54W–49L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.55
Ken Burkhart
28W–48L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.