Teams

Tran/Stokes

2025 OKCAdult 40 & Over League · 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings4 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OK/Cue-Day/40&over4.0M120481234429
2No Fault84372355496
3Tran/Stokes57312966538
4Servaces0121050106682

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Jonathan Benzer
published
3.80
Mark Harkins
published
3.78
Kent Coleman
published
An Nguyen
published 4
3.75
Brent Hall
published 4
3.71
3.70
Lane Wheeler
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Greg Lane
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.65
Ben Mccarley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Terry Stokes
usually #4 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.65
Julian Fuller
published
3.58
William Choi
published
3.39
Scott Tinsley
published
Michael Peters
published
Minh Tran
published
Rodney ODell
published
Shaji Jacob
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ben Mccarley + Lane Wheeler7550% games+11.6% vs expected
Brian Battershell + Rodney ODell4165% games+8.4% vs expected
Terry Stokes + Lane Wheeler4351% games+6.1% vs expected
Kent Coleman + Lane Wheeler9654% games+3.7% vs expected
An Nguyen + Kent Coleman2346% games+3.2% vs expected
William Choi + Brian Battershell12455% games+1.5% vs expected
Shaji Jacob + Scott Tinsley4153% games+0.6% vs expected
William Choi + Lane Wheeler7358% games+0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jonathan Benzer
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.92
Mark Harkins
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
Kent Coleman
64W–55L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
An Nguyen
12W–28L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Brent Hall
48W–42L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Brian Battershell
43W–27L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Lane Wheeler
81W–67L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.70
Greg Lane
58W–57L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.69
4
Ben Mccarley
33W–60L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Terry Stokes
48W–80L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Julian Fuller
15W–26L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
William Choi
41W–62L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
Scott Tinsley
33W–62L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.39
Michael Peters
23W–30L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Minh Tran
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rodney ODell
15W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shaji Jacob
35W–35L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.