Teams

Flanagan - Mixed 40s 7.0

2022 Piedmont Mixed Doubles 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-18vs Anderson/OFRC - Mixed 40s 7.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesThomas Dagger / Emily Wilson vs Paul Tapler / Amanda Tapler6-2, 6-2
2022-07-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesEmily Wilson / Ashley Fuquay vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-12vs Kirby - Mixed 40s 7.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEmily Wilson / Ashley Fuquay vs JAMES RO / Jennifer Tewksbury3-6, 1-6
2022-06-07vs Whichard/Easley - Mixed 40s 7.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesEmily Wilson / Mark Littrell vs John Gilman / Karyn Efird6-7, 4-6
2022-05-31vs Davis - Mixed 40s 7.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEmily Wilson / Ashley Fuquay vs Gina Goy / Matt Hall3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Kim Littrell
published
3.60
Luke Rhoten
published
3.48
Ashley Fuquay
published 3.5
3.35
Reeves Rhoten
published
3.31
Britt Flanagan
published 3.5
3.10
Emily Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Thomas Dagger
published
3.04
Mary Winstead
published
3.02
Paull Boger
published
2.96
Courtney Dagger
published 3
2.90
Mark Littrell
published
2.85
Annetta Bartle
published 3
Patrick Flanagan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Reeves Rhoten + Luke Rhoten7264% games+6.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Littrell
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
3.99
Luke Rhoten
50W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%23%77%
3.60
3.5
Ashley Fuquay
35W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.48
Reeves Rhoten
30W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Britt Flanagan
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Emily Wilson
179W–124L career · 9 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Thomas Dagger
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Mary Winstead
16W–22L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
Paull Boger
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Courtney Dagger
37W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
2.96
Mark Littrell
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Annetta Bartle
15W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
Patrick Flanagan
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.