Teams

Pura Vida

2025 USTA ADULT 40 and OVER - BOISE · TV

15 players · average NTRP 3.77 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-15Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Orr / David Roberts vs Kirk Porritt / Brian Johnson2-6, 2-6
2025-05-13vs Miller Time 40+Won 31
W#1 DoublesChris Gussner / Mark Phillips vs Joshua Harbst / William Goslovich4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBrian Kittelson vs Jared Arave6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDarron Peterson / Bill Sharp vs JAYDIP GUHA / Alan Hines5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesRoger Quarles / Joseph Brennan vs David Massie / Darwin Sloop5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-05-08vs BuffoonsWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Orr / Russell Moorhead vs Bob Lounsbury / Tom von Alten6-2, 7-6
2025-05-06vs You Can't Be SeriousLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Orr / Chris Gussner vs Mike Berry / Troy Casper4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrian Kittelson vs Stephen Heath6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Roberts / Roger Quarles vs Scott Stewart / Greg Haskell2-6, 4-6
2025-04-29vs Pack of AcesLost 12
L#1 DoublesBill Sharp / Mark Phillips vs Jeffrey Trask / Karl Baughman3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesBrian Kittelson vs Joseph Higgins7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRussell Moorhead / David Orr vs Derek Gochnour / Corey Garcia6-7, 2-6
2025-04-24vs Early Risers 40+Won 10
W#1 DoublesGreg Knudsen / Brian Kittelson vs Spencer Mumford / Ramey Uriarte7-5, 7-6
2025-04-15vs CHAK DE BOISE STARSWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Orr / Mike Bowie vs Simhachalam Pilla / Shashi K6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBill Sharp / Darron Peterson vs Chandra Angadi / Anil Kukutla4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRoger Quarles / Randy Howell vs Thierry Floch / Veeresh Gowdru Ramesh6-2, 6-2
2025-04-10vs MSA 40+ (Mas Serve Aces)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJay Larsen / Mike Bowie vs Anthony Magnuson / Michael Hermes2-6, 1-6
2025-04-02vs Ball of DutyLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Orr / Bill Sharp vs Bob Haycock / Dan Wold6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Roberts / Chris Gussner vs Eric Boyington / Ray Cochrane4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWillie Lafrades / Darron Peterson vs Casey Boren / Matt Sheils3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Early Risers 40+8131516242
2Pack of Aces7123921249
3MSA 40+ (Mas Serve Aces)63221436320
4You Can't Be Serious45171944339
5Miller Time 40+45132351335
6Ball of Duty35122047323
7Pura Vida27152148362
8CHAK DE BOISE STARS2782859388
9Buffoons1892759391

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Burton Jones
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.76
Greg Knudsen
published 4
Bill Sharp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Brian Kittelson
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
David Orr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Chris Gussner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Jay Larsen
published 4
3.56
Willie Lafrades
published 3.5
3.52
Jason Steele
published 3.5
3.40
Joseph Brennan
published 3.5
3.38
Russell Moorhead
published 3.5
Darron Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Randy Howell
published 3.5
Mike Bowie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Roger Quarles
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Randy Howell + Jason Steele71145% games+1.7% vs expected
Randy Howell + Willie Lafrades171153% games+0.4% vs expected
Russell Moorhead + Jay Larsen61145% games−2.7% vs expected
Randy Howell + Roger Quarles2840% gamesnot enough data
Darron Peterson + Bill Sharp3548% gamesnot enough data
Willie Lafrades + Jason Steele7067% gamesnot enough data
Greg Knudsen + Jay Larsen1441% gamesnot enough data
Russell Moorhead + David Orr224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Burton Jones
24W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Greg Knudsen
103W–90L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Bill Sharp
18W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Brian Kittelson
11W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
David Orr
8W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Chris Gussner
14W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Jay Larsen
35W–79L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
3.5
Willie Lafrades
112W–110L career · no lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Jason Steele
134W–112L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Joseph Brennan
35W–39L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Russell Moorhead
109W–102L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.38
3.5
Darron Peterson
14W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Randy Howell
61W–79L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Mike Bowie
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Roger Quarles
10W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.