Teams

7.5 Qualifying Team

2022 ITA MIXED · MXD 7.5 - 18 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-09-18vs Montana/Bach/ITAMX7.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesFrank Witt / Jill Witt vs Cyndy Desin / Chuck Smith7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCarol van Tuinen / Ben Fox vs Laura Rembe / Michael Turley4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRaymond Armstrong / Kellie Saville vs Ned Tranel / Sarah Bach6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2022-09-17vs Montana/Bach/ITAMX7.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesMary Milkovich / Jon Catton vs Brian Clifton / Jennifer Nielson6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBen Fox / Carol van Tuinen vs Laura Rembe / Michael Turley6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKellie Saville / Raymond Armstrong vs Sarah Bach / Ned Tranel3-6, 4-6
2022-09-16vs Montana/Bach/ITAMX7.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKellie Saville / Raymond Armstrong vs Sarah Bach / Ned Tranel2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMary Milkovich / Jon Catton vs Brian Clifton / Jennifer Nielson6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesFrank Witt / Jill Witt vs Cyndy Desin / Chuck Smith6-1, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · MXD 7.5 - 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Montana/Bach/ITAMX7.52163985
27.5 Qualifying Team12361285

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Sarah Bach
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Carol van Tuinen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Frank Witt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jill Witt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jon Catton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kellie Saville
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Milkovich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Raymond Armstrong
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Frank Witt + Jill Witt3252% gamesnot enough data
Raymond Armstrong + Kellie Saville033 matchesnot enough data
Raymond Armstrong + Sarah Bach213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sarah Bach
59W–54L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.89
3.5
Carol van Tuinen
9W–18L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Frank Witt
13W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jill Witt
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jon Catton
17W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kellie Saville
14W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Milkovich
9W–19L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Raymond Armstrong
12W–20L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.