Teams

Montana/Bach/ITAMX7.5

2022 ITA MIXED · MXD 7.5 - 18 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.70 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-09-18vs 7.5 Qualifying TeamWon 21
L#1 DoublesCyndy Desin / Chuck Smith vs Frank Witt / Jill Witt6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Rembe / Michael Turley vs Carol van Tuinen / Ben Fox6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNed Tranel / Sarah Bach vs Raymond Armstrong / Kellie Saville2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-17vs 7.5 Qualifying TeamLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrian Clifton / Jennifer Nielson vs Mary Milkovich / Jon Catton3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Rembe / Michael Turley vs Ben Fox / Carol van Tuinen4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Bach / Ned Tranel vs Kellie Saville / Raymond Armstrong6-3, 6-4
2022-09-16vs 7.5 Qualifying TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Bach / Ned Tranel vs Kellie Saville / Raymond Armstrong6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBrian Clifton / Jennifer Nielson vs Mary Milkovich / Jon Catton3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCyndy Desin / Chuck Smith vs Frank Witt / Jill Witt1-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · MXD 7.5 - 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Montana/Bach/ITAMX7.52163985
27.5 Qualifying Team12361285

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Sarah Bach
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Chuck Smith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Brian Clifton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Gordon Terpe
published 3.5
2.93
Cyndy Desin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jennifer Nielson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Laura Rembe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Turley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Molly Ogle
published
Ned Tranel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gordon Terpe + Sarah Bach3546% gamesnot enough data
Ned Tranel + Sarah Bach303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sarah Bach
59W–54L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Chuck Smith
5W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Brian Clifton
17W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Gordon Terpe
19W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Cyndy Desin
59W–102L career · 2 lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
2.93
Jennifer Nielson
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Rembe
25W–26L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Turley
10W–19L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Molly Ogle
17W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ned Tranel
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.