Teams

Kirkpatrick/GR

2025 TUL ADULT 18 & Over Day League · 2.5 WOMEN-DAY

10 players · average NTRP 2.92 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-05vs Gobbo/LFWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Vrooman / Missy Torgerson vs Hannah Payne / Jessica Williams6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBonnie Presley vs Evie Stover6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLindsey Kirkpatrick / Anna Shain vs Marla Croll / Halie Haile7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2024-10-30vs Gobbo/LFWon 21
L#1 DoublesLindsey Kirkpatrick / Missy Torgerson vs Evie Stover / Jessica Williams2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAudrey Reeves vs Stephanie Harris6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCrystal Wing / Anna Shain vs Marla Croll / Keely Gobbo6-2, 6-1
2024-10-11vs Coker-McCorkle/LFWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeather Denove / Missy Torgerson vs Nancy Park / Rebecca Horvath6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesLindsey Kirkpatrick vs Reya Burnett6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDanielle Watson / Kathryn Junk vs Karah Franklin / Maddie Morris6-1, 6-3
2024-10-04vs Welch/TTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeather Denove / Bonnie Presley vs Tara OMahony / Nina Butchko6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAudrey Reeves vs Rebecca Heatherman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCrystal Wing / Danielle Watson vs Edith Coen / Suzanne Wills6-1, 6-2
2024-09-27vs Burdette/LFWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathryn Junk / Bonnie Presley vs Teresa Forehand / Ann Neal6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesHeather Denove vs Erika Manlandro6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMary Vrooman / Missy Torgerson vs Canon Bomer / Yvette Tabor6-0, 6-0
2024-09-20vs Red 2: Wyatt/SHLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnna Shain / Audrey Reeves vs Ashwini Vaidya / Lisa Secrest6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKathryn Junk vs Felicity Jones0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCrystal Wing / Missy Torgerson vs Whitney Bingham / Alise Taylor4-6, 2-6
2024-09-13vs Red 1: Swiggett/LFLost 03
L#1 DoublesHeather Denove / Bonnie Presley vs Jill Croka / Lana Gooch0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMary Vrooman vs Emily Hatton6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDanielle Watson / Anna Shain vs Ashley Kent / Meryl Crimmins1-6, 0-6
2024-09-06vs Voegeli/TUWon 30
W#1 DoublesLindsey Kirkpatrick / Kathryn Junk vs Lindsay Gray / Kristine Kallenberger6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMary Vrooman vs Paige Voegeli6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCrystal Wing / Danielle Watson vs Linsy Schroder / Katie Bullock6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 2.5 WOMEN-DAY
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MoValley/Hendrix/18&over2.5W802316126
2Red 1: Swiggett/LF80213892
3Red 2: Wyatt/SH7119512126
4Blue 2: Yar/SH7116821179
5Kirkpatrick/GR6218616140
6Ellsworth/CR4415921173
7Welch/TTC44131124186
8Garcia/LF35111330226
9Hunt/LF3581634216
10Coker-McCorkle/LF3571736231
11Gobbo/LF26101432209
12Voegeli/TU2661838254
13Grimes/LF2661839250
14Fondren/LF1751939243
15Burdette/LF0822246285

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Bonnie Presley
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.63
Audrey Reeves
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Kathryn Junk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.58
Heather Denove
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.56
Anna Shain
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.53
Crystal Wing
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 3
2.50
Mary Vrooman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.47
Lindsey Kirkpatrick
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.29
Missy Torgerson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Danielle Watson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Watson + Crystal Wing3446% games+9.4% vs expected
Bonnie Presley + Lindsey Kirkpatrick3650% games+6.3% vs expected
Bonnie Presley + Heather Denove7751% games+5.6% vs expected
Bonnie Presley + Anna Shain2349% games+4.8% vs expected
Bonnie Presley + Missy Torgerson3442% games−2.4% vs expected
Missy Torgerson + Heather Denove3354% gamesnot enough data
Missy Torgerson + Lindsey Kirkpatrick0531% gamesnot enough data
Bonnie Presley + Kathryn Junk314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bonnie Presley
54W–47L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Audrey Reeves
42W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
2.63
Kathryn Junk
20W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
2.63
3
Heather Denove
25W–23L career · 7 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Anna Shain
16W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Crystal Wing
24W–29L career · 9 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.53
Mary Vrooman
16W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
Lindsey Kirkpatrick
33W–41L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%59%41%
2.47
Missy Torgerson
34W–38L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.29
2.5
Danielle Watson
20W–35L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.