Teams

Coker-McCorkle/LF

2025 TUL ADULT 18 & Over Day League · 2.5 WOMEN-DAY

12 players · average NTRP / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-15vs Red 1: Swiggett/LFLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Park / Lori Smith vs Nicole Swiggett / Lana Gooch0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesStacy Argue vs Emily Hatton0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Horvath / Tien Dang vs Olivia Bliss / Jamie Calkins1-6, 0-6
2024-11-10vs Voegeli/TUWon 21
L#1 DoublesKathy Pike / Kay Gulledge vs Amy Witkowski / Lindsay Gray6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLaQuisha Epps vs Nimisha Patel6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesReya Burnett / Maddie Morris vs Paige Voegeli / Kristine Kallenberger7-5, 6-1
2024-11-01vs Red 2: Wyatt/SHLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaQuisha Epps / Tien Dang vs Felicity Jones / Ashwini Vaidya6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMaddie Morris vs Alise Taylor0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKay Gulledge / Lori Smith vs Amanda Stidham / Sarah Garrow3-6, 0-6
2024-10-25vs Red 2: Wyatt/SHLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaQuisha Epps / Stacy Argue vs Felicity Jones / Ashwini Vaidya1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKarah Franklin vs Alise Taylor2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Pike / Reya Burnett vs Sarah Garrow / Whitney Bingham1-6, 1-6
2024-10-11vs Kirkpatrick/GRLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Park / Rebecca Horvath vs Heather Denove / Missy Torgerson2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesReya Burnett vs Lindsey Kirkpatrick1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKarah Franklin / Maddie Morris vs Danielle Watson / Kathryn Junk1-6, 3-6
2024-09-27vs Gobbo/LFLost 12
W#1 DoublesKay Gulledge / Lori Smith vs Stephanie Harris / Evie Stover6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesRebecca Horvath vs Marla Croll2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesStacy Argue / Tien Dang vs Keely Gobbo / Amy Arnold4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-09-13vs Welch/TTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Park / Maddie Morris vs Nina Butchko / Sheila Ellis6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesTien Dang vs Molly McCormick1-6, 1-3
L#2 DoublesKarah Franklin / Kathy Pike vs Reagan Welch / Jaye Downs2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2024-09-06vs Burdette/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesRebecca Horvath / Stacy Argue vs Racheal Burdette / Abbey Johnson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLaQuisha Epps vs Madeline Johnson6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesReya Burnett / Karah Franklin vs Molly Meyer / Erika Manlandro6-2, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 2.5 WOMEN-DAY
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MoValley/Hendrix/18&over2.5W802316126
2Red 1: Swiggett/LF80213892
3Red 2: Wyatt/SH7119512126
4Blue 2: Yar/SH7116821179
5Kirkpatrick/GR6218616140
6Ellsworth/CR4415921173
7Welch/TTC44131124186
8Garcia/LF35111330226
9Hunt/LF3581634216
10Coker-McCorkle/LF3571736231
11Gobbo/LF26101432209
12Voegeli/TU2661838254
13Grimes/LF2661839250
14Fondren/LF1751939243
15Burdette/LF0822246285

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.66
LaQuisha Epps
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.32
Stacy Argue
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.29
Kay Gulledge
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.28
Maddie Morris
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.25
Tien Dang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.24
Nancy Park
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.18
Karah Franklin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.13
Rebecca Horvath
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.07
Stacey Coker
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kathy Pike
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lori Smith
published
Reya Burnett
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Smith + Kay Gulledge91149% games−5.7% vs expected
Nancy Park + Kay Gulledge3643% games−5.9% vs expected
Stacey Coker + Tien Dang123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

LaQuisha Epps
46W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.66
Stacy Argue
7W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.32
Kay Gulledge
102W–127L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.29
Maddie Morris
8W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.28
Tien Dang
24W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
Nancy Park
58W–92L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.24
Karah Franklin
8W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Rebecca Horvath
11W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Stacey Coker
19W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Kathy Pike
0W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Smith
33W–34L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Reya Burnett
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.