Teams

Ellsworth/CR

2025 TUL ADULT 18 & Over Day League · 2.5 WOMEN-DAY

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-08vs Blue 2: Yar/SHLost 12
W#1 DoublesCourtney Duffy / Kendall Ellsworth vs Laura Barnes / Maggie Yar6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrooke Sawyer vs Hailey Woodard3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrynne Hinkle / Meagan Schatzman vs Megan Buchan / Katie Hughes6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2024-11-01vs Grimes/LFLost 12
L#1 DoublesLiberty Gorospe / Mia Perkins vs Meredith Peterson / Sarah Isbell6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLeah Maples vs Rachel McAlpin6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMeagan Schatzman / Brynne Hinkle vs Lindsay Farrar / Nerida Garcia3-6, 2-6
2024-10-25vs Fondren/LFWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrooke Sawyer / Tiffany Osborne vs Tonya Fondren / Stacie Russell6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMia Perkins / Brynne Hinkle vs Stacey Coker / Jenny Cuadra6-1, 6-0
2024-10-16vs Hunt/LFWon 20
W#1 DoublesMia Perkins / Liberty Gorospe vs Melanie Lovelace / Tonya Turiano6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTiffany Osborne / Kendall Ellsworth vs Tarynn Venable / Micah Tjeerdsma6-2, 6-1
2024-10-11vs Garcia/LFLost 02
L#1 DoublesMia Perkins / Meagan Schatzman vs Kelly Hunt / Darla Knight7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCourtney Duffy / Brooke Sawyer vs Elaina Osteen / Susamma Rajan4-6, 5-7
2024-09-20vs MoValley/Hendrix/18&over2.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesCourtney Duffy / Kendall Ellsworth vs Allison Creel / Katie Sachse6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLiberty Gorospe / Leah Maples vs Amber Hendrix / Elizabeth Skelton1-6, 0-6
2024-09-13vs Grimes/LFWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrynne Hinkle / Meagan Schatzman vs Miranda Grimes / Michelle Livesay6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLeah Maples vs Bebe Abramson6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrooke Sawyer / Tiffany Osborne vs Sarah Isbell / Jennifer Morales6-3, 6-1
2024-09-06vs Fondren/LFWon 20
W#1 DoublesKendall Ellsworth / Courtney Duffy vs Stacie Russell / Jamie Huth6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLeah Maples / Meagan Schatzman vs Jenny Cuadra / Elizabeth Letcher6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 2.5 WOMEN-DAY
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MoValley/Hendrix/18&over2.5W802316126
2Red 1: Swiggett/LF80213892
3Red 2: Wyatt/SH7119512126
4Blue 2: Yar/SH7116821179
5Kirkpatrick/GR6218616140
6Ellsworth/CR4415921173
7Welch/TTC44131124186
8Garcia/LF35111330226
9Hunt/LF3581634216
10Coker-McCorkle/LF3571736231
11Gobbo/LF26101432209
12Voegeli/TU2661838254
13Grimes/LF2661839250
14Fondren/LF1751939243
15Burdette/LF0822246285

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Kendall Ellsworth
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.63
Leah Maples
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.49
Brooke Sawyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.45
Courtney Duffy
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.32
Tiffany Osborne
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Brynne Hinkle
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.04
Liberty Gorospe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Heather Smith
published
Meagan Schatzman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Mia Perkins
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liberty Gorospe + Mia Perkins6257% games+9.2% vs expected
Courtney Duffy + Kendall Ellsworth61143% games−0.2% vs expected
Liberty Gorospe + Kendall Ellsworth2343% gamesnot enough data
Kendall Ellsworth + Leah Maples3252% gamesnot enough data
Courtney Duffy + Tiffany Osborne134 matchesnot enough data
Courtney Duffy + Mia Perkins314 matchesnot enough data
Brynne Hinkle + Meagan Schatzman224 matchesnot enough data
Tiffany Osborne + Liberty Gorospe213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kendall Ellsworth
70W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%5%95%
2.73
Leah Maples
26W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Brooke Sawyer
14W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.49
3
Courtney Duffy
22W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.45
Tiffany Osborne
20W–48L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Brynne Hinkle
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Liberty Gorospe
23W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Heather Smith
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Meagan Schatzman
6W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mia Perkins
19W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.