Teams

IE-LLW-Andulka-Nutty Mix-Ungeheuer

2024 So Cal Mixed Doubles Tri-Level - IE · Mixed Tri-Level 6.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-02vs IE-Andulka-Mixed Nuts-PereyraSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJill Schoner / Richard Wilson vs Saleshnie Sukhram / Elliott Kiedrowski3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGINA SKIBAR / Jesse Reyes vs Betty Hao / George Ballantyne6-4, 6-4
2024-10-19vs IE-RCC-LiLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristopher Enciso / Ilse Ungeheuer vs Heidi Schuler / Hong Ye1-6, 1-6
2024-10-12vs IE-MTC-ShelterSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChristopher Enciso / Ilse Ungeheuer vs Renzo Rodriguez / Rebecca Cloyd6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesStephen Park / Jill Schoner vs David Duncan / Mary Ann Neder1-6, 1-6
2024-10-06vs IE-Silver Lakes-NorikoLost 02
L#1 DoublesIlse Ungeheuer / Christopher Enciso vs Kelly Bollmann / Zachary McKellar2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGINA SKIBAR / Carsten Seemann vs Oraer Pluta / Charles Pluta5-7, 2-6
2024-09-28vs IE-CCCCSplit 11
L#2 DoublesIlse Ungeheuer / Stephen Park vs Ashleen Lai / Kennett Lai3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesGINA SKIBAR / Dhairya Barot vs Sesilie Kay / Phil Taylor6-2, 6-2
2024-09-14vs IE-RCC-LiLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristopher Enciso / Ilse Ungeheuer vs Carrie Ou / Hong Ye6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed Tri-Level 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
3.54
Joe Lopez
published
3.41
Ilse Ungeheuer
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Carsten Seemann
published 3.5
Dhairya Barot
published 3.5
3.25
Deborah Laurent
published 3.5
3.13
Virginia Chang
published
3.11
GINA SKIBAR
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Jinyong Liu
published
3.08
Jill Schoner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Jo Russo-Pereyra
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Virginia Chang + Christopher Enciso5260% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Enciso
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.66
Joe Lopez
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.54
3.5
Ilse Ungeheuer
89W–80L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Carsten Seemann
1W–0L career · type M · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Dhairya Barot
0W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Deborah Laurent
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Virginia Chang
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.13
3.5
GINA SKIBAR
114W–80L career · 3 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
Jinyong Liu
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
Jill Schoner
75W–76L career · 2 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
3
Jo Russo-Pereyra
79W–72L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.