Teams

IE-Silver Lakes-Noriko

2024 So Cal Mixed Doubles Tri-Level - IE · Mixed Tri-Level 6.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.58 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-09vs IE-CCCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAdam Kasbon / Kelly Bollmann vs Dang Nguyen / Ashleen Lai4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesWonsik Bollmann / Hope Young vs Vincent Olague / Amy Taylor6-1, 6-3
2024-10-19vs IE-Andulka-Mixed Nuts-PereyraLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Bollmann / Rich Calia vs Tony Archer / Elizabeth Curtiss4-6, 0-6
2024-10-12vs IE-RCC-LiWon 10
W#3 DoublesOraer Pluta / Joseph Eiswert vs Arianna Johnson / Xinke Chen6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesKelly Bollmann / Zachary McKellar vs Ilse Ungeheuer / Christopher Enciso6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesOraer Pluta / Charles Pluta vs GINA SKIBAR / Carsten Seemann7-5, 6-2
2024-09-29vs IE-MTC-ShelterWon 10
W#1 DoublesWonsik Bollmann / Kelly Bollmann vs David Duncan / Judy Henning3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-09-22vs IE-Andulka-Mixed Nuts-PereyraWon 10
W#2 DoublesCharles Pluta / Oraer Pluta vs Elizabeth Curtiss / Elliott Kiedrowski6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed Tri-Level 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Adam Kasbon
published 4
3.51
Kelly Bollmann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Charles Pluta
published 4
3.36
Wonsik Bollmann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Noriko Hanawa
published
3.14
Allison Samp
published 3.5
2.91
Oraer Pluta
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.51
Jammie Shedden
published
Gary Johnson
published
Joseph Eiswert
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Bollmann + Wonsik Bollmann353350% games−0.8% vs expected
Charles Pluta + Oraer Pluta224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adam Kasbon
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
3.5
Kelly Bollmann
73W–87L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.51
4
Charles Pluta
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Wonsik Bollmann
86W–93L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
Noriko Hanawa
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Allison Samp
4W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
3
Oraer Pluta
62W–37L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
Jammie Shedden
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
2.51
Gary Johnson
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Joseph Eiswert
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.